Literature DB >> 18546703

Geostatistical modeling of the spatial distribution of soil dioxins in the vicinity of an incinerator. 1. Theory and application to Midland, Michigan.

Pierre Goovaerts1, Hoa T Trinh, Avery Demond, Alfred Franzblau, David Garabrant, Brenda Gillespie, James Lepkowski, Peter Adriaens.   

Abstract

Deposition of pollutants around point sources of contamination, such as incinerators, can display complex spatial patterns depending on prevailing weather conditions, the local topography, and the characteristics of the source. Deterministic dispersion models often fail to capture the complexity observed in the field, resulting in uncertain predictions that might hamper subsequent decision-making, such as delineation of areas targeted for additional sampling or remediation. This paper describes a geostatistical simulation-based methodology that combines the detailed process-based modeling of atmospheric deposition from an incinerator with the probabilistic modeling of residual variability of field samples. The approach is used to delineate areas with high levels of dioxin TEQ(DF)-WHO98 (toxic equivalents) around an incinerator, accounting for 53 field data and the output of the EPA Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) dispersion model. The dispersion model explains 43.7% of the variance in the soil TEQ data, whereas the regression residuals are spatially correlated with a range of 776 m. One hundred realizations of soil TEQ values are simulated on a grid with a 50 m spacing. The benefit of stochastic simulation over spatial interpolation is 2-fold: (1) maps of simulated point TEQ values can easily be aggregated to the geography that is the most relevant for decision making (e.g., census block, ZIP codes); and (2) the uncertainty at the larger scale is simply modeled by the empirical distribution of block-averaged simulated values. Incorporating the output of the atmospheric deposition model as a spatial trend yields a more realistic prediction of the spatial distribution of TEQ values than log-normal kriging using only the field data, in particular, in sparsely sampled areas away from the incinerator. The geostatistical model provided guidance for the study design (census block-based population sampling) of the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study (UMDES), focused on quantifying exposure pathways to dioxins from industrial sources, relative to background exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18546703      PMCID: PMC2577050          DOI: 10.1021/es702494z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  11 in total

1.  Accounting for source location and transport direction into geostatistical prediction of contaminants.

Authors:  H Saito; P Goovaerts
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Identifying populations at risk from environmental contamination from point sources.

Authors:  F L R Williams; S A Ogston
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Validation of modeling approach to evaluate congener-specific concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in air and soil near a solid waste incinerator.

Authors:  K Yoshida; S Ikeda; J Nakanishi; C N Tsuzuki
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Atmospheric fate and transport of dioxins: local impacts.

Authors:  K Lohman; C Seigneur
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 5.  Classification criteria and probability risk maps: limitations and perspectives.

Authors:  Michaela Saisana; Gregoire Dubois; Archontoula Chaloulakou; Nikolas Spyrellis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Mapping the results of extensive surveys: the case of atmospheric biomonitoring and terrestrial mosses.

Authors:  J R Aboal; C Real; J A Fernández; A Carballeira
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Influence of a municipal solid waste incinerator on ambient air and soil PCDD/Fs levels.

Authors:  Jeong-Eun Oh; Sung-Deuk Choi; Se-Jin Lee; Yoon-Seok Chang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Dispersion modeling as a dioxin exposure indicator in the vicinity of a municipal solid waste incinerator: a validation study.

Authors:  Nathalie Floret; Jean-François Viel; Eric Lucot; Pierre-Michel Dudermel; Jean-Yves Cahn; Pierre-Marie Badot; Frédéric Mauny
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Dioxins and furans in air and deposition: a review of levels, behaviour and processes.

Authors:  R Lohmann; K C Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1998-08-12       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Visualization and exploratory analysis of epidemiologic data using a novel space time information system.

Authors:  Gillian A Avruskin; Geoffrey M Jacquez; Jaymie R Meliker; Melissa J Slotnick; Andrew M Kaufmann; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 3.918

View more
  5 in total

1.  Accuracy and uncertainty analysis of soil Bbf spatial distribution estimation at a coking plant-contaminated site based on normalization geostatistical technologies.

Authors:  Geng Liu; Junjie Niu; Chao Zhang; Guanlin Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Geostatistical modeling of the spatial distribution of soil dioxin in the vicinity of an incinerator. 2. Verification and calibration study.

Authors:  Pierre Goovaerts; Hoa T Trinh; Avery H Demond; Timothy Towey; Shu-Chi Chang; Danielle Gwinn; Biling Hong; Alfred Franzblau; David Garabrant; Brenda W Gillespie; James Lepkowski; Peter Adriaens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Characterization and assessment of contaminated soil and groundwater at an organic chemical plant site in Chongqing, Southwest China.

Authors:  Geng Liu; Junjie Niu; Chao Zhang; Guanlin Guo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  The University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study: methods for an environmental exposure study of polychlorinated dioxins, furans, and biphenyls.

Authors:  David H Garabrant; Alfred Franzblau; James Lepkowski; Brenda W Gillespie; Peter Adriaens; Avery Demond; Barbara Ward; Kathy Ladronka; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Kristine Knutson; Lynn Zwica; Kristen Olson; Timothy Towey; Qixuan Chen; Biling Hong
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Spatial variations in the incidence of breast cancer and potential risks associated with soil dioxin contamination in Midland, Saginaw, and Bay Counties, Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Dajun Dai; Tonny J Oyana
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 5.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.