Literature DB >> 1854615

Evaluation of serum CA15-3 determination with CEA and TPA in the post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients.

A Nicolini1, C Colombini, L Luciani, A Carpi, L Giuliani.   

Abstract

The usefulness of post-operatively serial serum CA15-3 determination with CEA and TPA was evaluated in a group of 285 breast cancer patients. In particular, the CA15-3 sensitivity to 'early' diagnosis and monitoring of the response to treatment of breast cancer relapses, was compared with those of the two other markers in order to define the most suitable association. Moreover, in a group of 169 non relapsed patients with a prolonged follow-up (40 +/- 8 months; mean +/- s.d.) CA15-3 specificity was investigated. During post-operative follow-up in 27 (10%) patients, distant metastases occurred. In most of them, elevated values of one or more tumour markers were the first pathological sign and CA15-3, CEA and TPA sensitivity to 'early' diagnosis of metastases were 46%, 7% and 63% respectively. When each tumour marker was considered in combination, CA15-3-CEA-TPA association showed a higher sensitivity (87%) than both CA15-3-TPA (83%) and the CEA-TPA (70%). Serum CA15-3 increase preceded the certain sign of metastases 2.7 +/- 2.6 months (mean +/- s.d.). Shortly before appearance and during treatment of distant metastases, constant elevation and/or progressive increase in serum CA15-3 values occurred in all evaluated patients except three in whom isolated elevated values were found as well. In 24 (14%) of 169 non relapsed patients with prolonged follow-up (40 +/- 8 months; mean +/- s.d.) high serum CA15-3 values occurred. In 16 of these 24 patients, an isolated elevated value was found, while four (2.3%) or the eight remaining ones with constant elevation and/or progressive increase were falsely suspected of metastases. In this group of non relapsed patients, chronic liver failure, diabetes and/or hepatic steatosis were the reasons more commonly responsible for the CA15-3 increase. In metastatic patients, no organ-specificity was shown either by CA15-3 or by CEA and TPA. In these patients serum TPA values showed the highest sensitivity and paralleled clinical and/or instrumental signs better than the CA15-3 and even more than CEA values. These data indicate that in the post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients, TPA is the most useful tumour marker and TPA-CA15-3 the most suitable association. Contemporaneous measurement of serum CEA levels only slightly increases sensitivity and positive predictive value of TPA-CA15-3 combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1854615      PMCID: PMC1977334          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1991.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  13 in total

Review 1.  Tumor markers for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D E Haagensen
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.935

2.  Serum antibody in patients with mammary disease.

Authors:  L J Humphrey; N C Estes; P A Morse; W R Jewell; R A Boudet; M J Hudson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Recovery of immunologically reactive antibodies and antigens from breast cancer immune complexes by preparative isoelectric focusing.

Authors:  B W Maidment; L D Papsidero; T Nemoto; T M Chu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A Nicolini; A Carpi; G Di Marco; L Giuliani; R Giordani; S Palla
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Circulating CA 15.3 levels in breast cancer. Our present experience.

Authors:  R Colomer; A Ruibal; M Navarro; G Encabo; L A Sole; L Salvador
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1986 May-Aug       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  Adjuvant endocrine therapy of primary operable breast cancer. Report on the Copenhagen breast cancer trials.

Authors:  T Palshof; H T Mouridsen; J L Daehnfeldt
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Ability of CEA blood levels to reflect tumour burden: a study in a human xenograft model.

Authors:  J B Quayle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Carcinoembryonic antigen and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) in preoperative staging and postoperative monitoring of patients with carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Y T Omar; A E Behbehani; N al-Naqeeb; M M Motawy; M O Folldi; A H Awwad; M Y Nasralla; J J Szymendera
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.248

9.  Serum CA 15.3 levels in patients with non-tumoral diseases, and establishment of a threshold for tumoral activity. Results in 1219 patients.

Authors:  A Ruibal; J Genollá; M Rosell; J M Gris; R Colomer
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1986 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

10.  CA 15.3 as a tumour marker in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Schmidt-Rhode; K D Schulz; G Sturm; A Raab-Frick; H Prinz
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1987 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Mucins in the pathogenesis of breast cancer: implications in diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Partha Mukhopadhyay; Subhankar Chakraborty; Moorthy P Ponnusamy; Imayavaramban Lakshmanan; Maneesh Jain; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-01-26

2.  Serum tumor marker kinetics and the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H Sonoo; J Kurebayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Determination of the prognostic value of preoperative CA15-3 and CEA in predicting the prognosis of young patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Danian Dai; Bo Chen; Hailin Tang; Xiaoming Xie; Weidong Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Kinetics of CEA and CA15-3 correlate with treatment response in patients undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  Dorit Di Gioia; Volker Heinemann; Dorothea Nagel; Michael Untch; Steffen Kahlert; Ingo Bauerfeind; Thomas Koehnke; Petra Stieber
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-05-08

Review 5.  Serum microRNA-21 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shichao Li; Xiaorong Yang; Jinmei Yang; Jiesheng Zhen; Dechun Zhang
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Immunosuppressive acidic protein serum levels in breast cancer patients in a reference to CA 15-3 levels.

Authors:  A D Cohen; Y Shoenfeld; J Gopas; Y Cohen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Circulating tumour markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ettore Seregni; Antonio Coli; Nicola Mazzucca
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Prognostic value of monitoring tumour markers CA 15-3 and CEA during fulvestrant treatment.

Authors:  Rupert Bartsch; Catharina Wenzel; Ursula Pluschnig; Dagmar Hussian; Ursula Sevelda; Gabriela Altorjai; Gottfried J Locker; Robert Mader; Christoph C Zielinski; Guenther G Steger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-26       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15.3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15.3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolini; Gianna Tartarelli; Angelo Carpi; Maria Rita Metelli; Paola Ferrari; Loretta Anselmi; Massimo Conte; Piero Berti; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  A Diagnostic Analysis Workflow to Optimal Multiple Tumor Markers to Predict the Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer from Breast Lumps.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Tian Tian; Xianyang Chen; Guofen Zhang; Lijie Pan; Chengping Yan; Guoshan Yang; Lili Wang; Xuchen Cao; Xin Wang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.