Literature DB >> 18545882

Anastomotic leaks after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer: survey of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery.

C R Asteria1, G Gagliardi, S Pucciarelli, G Romano, A Infantino, F La Torre, F Tonelli, F Martin, C Pulica, V Ripetti, G Diana, G Amicucci, M Carlini, A Sommariva, G Vinciguerra, D B Poddie, A Amato, R Bassi, R Galleano, E Veronese, S Mancini, G Pescio, G L Occelli, S Bracchitta, M Castagnola, T Pontillo, G Cimmino, U Prati, R Vincenti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the survey was to assess the incidence of anastomotic leaks (AL) and to identify risk factors predicting incidence and gravity of AL after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer performed by colorectal surgeons of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).
METHODS: Information about patients with rectal cancers less than 12 cm from the anal verge who underwent LAR during 2005 was collected retrospectively. AL was classified as grade I to IV according to gravity. Fifteen clinical variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Further analysis was conducted on patients with AL to identify factors correlated with gravity.
RESULTS: There were 520 patients representing 64% of LAR for rectal cancer performed by SICCR members. The overall rate of AL was 15.2%. Mortality was 2.7% including 0.6% from AL. The incidence of AL was correlated with higher age (p<0.05), lower (<20 per year) centre case volume (p<0.05), obesity (p<0.05), malnutrition (p<0.01) and intraoperative contamination (p<0.05), and was lower in patients with a colonic J-pouch reservoir (p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis age, malnutrition and intraoperative contamination were independent predictors. The only predictor of severe (grade III/IV) AL was alcohol/smoking habits (p<0.05) while the absence of a diverting stoma was borderline significant (p<0.07).
CONCLUSION: Our retrospective survey identified several risk factors for AL. This survey was a necessary step to construct prospective interventional studies and to establish benchmark standards for outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18545882     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-008-0407-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  57 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  P B Soeters; J P J G M de Zoete; C H C Dejong; N S Williams; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.

Authors:  M T Eriksen; A Wibe; J Norstein; J Haffner; J N Wiig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Junji Kishimoto; Hirokazu Nagawa
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Nutritional approach in malnourished surgical patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Giovanni Radaelli; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-02

5.  Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  T R Schrock; C W Deveney; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  Local recurrence following 'curative' surgery for large bowel cancer: II. The rectum and rectosigmoid.

Authors:  R K Phillips; R Hittinger; L Blesovsky; J S Fry; L P Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Colorectal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit.

Authors:  J Mella; A Biffin; A G Radcliffe; J D Stamatakis; R J Steele
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Management of distal rectal cancer: results from a national survey.

Authors:  G Melotti; E De Antoni; A Habr-Gama; A Minicozzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-01-19

2.  Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment.

Authors:  Freek Daams; Misha Luyer; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Strategies of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Qi-Yue Chen; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Zhi-Liang Hong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

4.  Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Stefanie Kudszus; Christian Roesel; Alexander Schachtrupp; Jörg J Höer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  The Role of Temporary Fecal Diversion.

Authors:  Amy L Lightner; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

6.  Obesity and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp; Lauren Kosinski; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-12

Review 7.  Prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery based on a new prognostic index PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage) developed from the meta-analysis of observational studies of risk factors.

Authors:  S A Rojas-Machado; M Romero-Simó; A Arroyo; A Rojas-Machado; J López; R Calpena
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A comment on "The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery" by Arezzo A et al.

Authors:  R Reddavid; L Puca; G Osella; E Potenza; M Degiuli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Maurizio Degiuli; Ugo Elmore; Raffaele De Luca; Paola De Nardi; Mariano Tomatis; Alberto Biondi; Roberto Persiani; Leonardo Solaini; Gianluca Rizzo; Domenico Soriero; Desiree Cianflocca; Marco Milone; Giulia Turri; Daniela Rega; Paolo Delrio; Corrado Pedrazzani; Giovanni D De Palma; Felice Borghi; Stefano Scabini; Claudio Coco; Davide Cavaliere; Michele Simone; Riccardo Rosati; Rossella Reddavid
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.917

10.  Is water-soluble contrast enema examination for integrity of rectal anastomosis necessary prior to ileostomy reversal?

Authors:  Hui Lu Goh; Lauren Hawkins; Sivesh K Kamarajah; Sharad Karandikar; Mark Goldstein
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-11-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.