Literature DB >> 18545021

Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery.

Sachin D Kalyani1, Alisa Kim, John G Ladas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Corneal refractive procedures have become increasingly popular over the past decade, allowing patients to have excellent uncorrected visual acuity and spectacle independence. As these individuals mature, many will eventually undergo cataract surgery. With the advances in modern cataract surgery and lens implant technology, particularly presbyopic intraocular lens implants, patients and physicians have greater expectations regarding visual outcomes and independence from glasses after cataract surgery. Therefore, it is important to understand methods to accurately determine intraocular lens power calculation after keratorefractive procedures to avoid refractive surprises and patient dissatisfaction. RECENT
FINDINGS: In this review article, we provide an overview of intraocular lens power determination after corneal refractive surgery, highlighting sources of errors and potential methods to improve the accuracy of the lens power estimation.
SUMMARY: Newer methods to address errors in intraocular lens power calculations after keratorefractive surgery represent a paradigm shift from the previous gold standard of the clinical history method. Understanding the advantages and limitations of the various methods may be beneficial in obtaining more accurate estimations of the intraocular lens power after corneal refractive surgery, resulting in improved visual outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18545021     DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282fec43e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of total corneal power after myopic corneal refractive surgery in Chinese eyes.

Authors:  Yanjun Hua; Chao Pan; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Optimization of intraocular lens constant improves refractive outcomes in combined endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery.

Authors:  Gustavo Bonfadini; John G Ladas; Hamilton Moreira; Mauro Campos; Mario Matthaei; Beatriz Muñoz; Kim Pratzer; Albert S Jun
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Agreement between clinical history method, Orbscan IIz, and Pentacam in estimating corneal power after myopic excimer laser surgery.

Authors:  Kaevalin Lekhanont; Manachai Nonpassopon; Khemruetai Wannarosapark; Varintorn Chuckpaiwong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.

Authors:  Yanjun Hua; Zequan Xu; Wei Qiu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy versus Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Javadi; Sepehr Feizi; Roya Jafari; Firooz Mirbabaee; Vahid Ownagh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 6.  Intraocular lens calculations in atypical eyes.

Authors:  Aazim A Siddiqui; Uday Devgan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Evaluation of Equivalent Keratometry Readings Obtained by Pentacam HR (High Resolution).

Authors:  Yanjun Hua; Xiaolan Zhang; Tor Paaske Utheim; Jinhai Huang; Chao Pan; Weina Tan; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.