OBJECTIVES: The Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) score has been reported to have good stratification ability in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the JIS score could not estimate malignant grade of HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new staging system: the biomarker combined JIS (bm-JIS) which includes three tumor markers: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin with the conventional JIS score. METHODS: A total of 1,924 HCC patients were included in this study. We compared their overall survival, the stratification ability and suitability as a prognostic model according to the bm-JIS score and the conventional JIS score. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the survival curves for all bm-JIS scores. For the conventional JIS scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3, the survival curves differed greatly according to the bm-JIS score (p < 0.0001). The independent homogenizing ability and the stratification value of the JIS score and the bm-JIS score determined by the likelihood ratio test using the Cox proportional hazard regression model showed the bm-JIS score to have a higher value(chi2 = 717.348) than the JIS score (chi2 = 668.91). CONCLUSIONS: The bm-JIS score showed superior stratification ability and thus was found to be a better predictor of the prognosis than the conventional JIS score, especially for the patients with good prognosis. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVES: The Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) score has been reported to have good stratification ability in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the JIS score could not estimate malignant grade of HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new staging system: the biomarker combined JIS (bm-JIS) which includes three tumor markers: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin with the conventional JIS score. METHODS: A total of 1,924 HCC patients were included in this study. We compared their overall survival, the stratification ability and suitability as a prognostic model according to the bm-JIS score and the conventional JIS score. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the survival curves for all bm-JIS scores. For the conventional JIS scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3, the survival curves differed greatly according to the bm-JIS score (p < 0.0001). The independent homogenizing ability and the stratification value of the JIS score and the bm-JIS score determined by the likelihood ratio test using the Cox proportional hazard regression model showed the bm-JIS score to have a higher value(chi2 = 717.348) than the JIS score (chi2 = 668.91). CONCLUSIONS: The bm-JIS score showed superior stratification ability and thus was found to be a better predictor of the prognosis than the conventional JIS score, especially for the patients with good prognosis. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Xavier Adhoute; Guillaume Penaranda; Jean Luc Raoul; Patrice Le Treut; Emilie Bollon; Jean Hardwigsen; Paul Castellani; Hervé Perrier; Marc Bourlière Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2016-06-18
Authors: Miu Yee Chan; Wong Hoi She; Wing Chiu Dai; Simon Hing Yin Tsang; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok; Albert Chi Yan Chan; Jame Fung; Chung Mau Lo; Tan To Cheung Journal: Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-07-11
Authors: Quirino Lai; Fabio Melandro; Rafael S Pinheiro; Andrea Donfrancesco; Bashir A Fadel; Giovanni B Levi Sandri; Massimo Rossi; Pasquale B Berloco; Fabrizio M Frattaroli Journal: Int J Hepatol Date: 2012-06-27