Literature DB >> 18544547

Microarray-based classification and clinical predictors: on combined classifiers and additional predictive value.

Anne-Laure Boulesteix1, Christine Porzelius, Martin Daumer.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: In the context of clinical bioinformatics methods are needed for assessing the additional predictive value of microarray data compared to simple clinical parameters alone. Such methods should also provide an optimal prediction rule making use of all potentialities of both types of data: they should ideally be able to catch subtypes which are not identified by clinical parameters alone. Moreover, they should address the question of the additional predictive value of microarray data in a fair framework.
RESULTS: We propose a novel but simple two-step approach based on random forests and partial least squares (PLS) dimension reduction embedding the idea of pre-validation suggested by Tibshirani and colleagues, which is based on an internal cross-validation for avoiding overfitting. Our approach is fast, flexible and can be used both for assessing the overall additional significance of the microarray data and for building optimal hybrid classification rules. Its efficiency is demonstrated through simulations and an application to breast cancer and colorectal cancer data. AVAILABILITY: Our method is implemented in the freely available R package 'MAclinical' which can be downloaded from http://www.stat.uni-muenchen.de/~socher/MAclinical

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544547     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of methods for classifying clinical samples based on proteomics data: a case study for statistical and machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Dayle L Sampson; Tony J Parker; Zee Upton; Cameron P Hurst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Derivation of cancer diagnostic and prognostic signatures from gene expression data.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Yijun Sun; Virginia Urquidi
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  WNT pathway signaling is associated with microvascular injury and predicts kidney transplant failure.

Authors:  Michael E Seifert; Joseph P Gaut; Boyi Guo; Sanjay Jain; Andrew F Malone; Feargal Geraghty; Deborah L Della Manna; Eddy S Yang; Nengjun Yi; Daniel C Brennan; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  stepwiseCM: An R Package for Stepwise Classification of Cancer Samples Using Multiple Heterogeneous Data Sets.

Authors:  Askar Obulkasim; Mark A van de Wiel
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-01-02

5.  Testing the additional predictive value of high-dimensional molecular data.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Integrative mixture of experts to combine clinical factors and gene markers.

Authors:  Kim-Anh Lê Cao; Emmanuelle Meugnier; Geoffrey J McLachlan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Ensemble approach combining multiple methods improves human transcription start site prediction.

Authors:  David G Dineen; Markus Schröder; Desmond G Higgins; Pádraig Cunningham
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Clinical bioinformatics for complex disorders: a schizophrenia case study.

Authors:  Emanuel Schwarz; F Markus Leweke; Sabine Bahn; Pietro Liò
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Lung cancer gene expression database analysis incorporating prior knowledge with support vector machine-based classification method.

Authors:  Peng Guan; Desheng Huang; Miao He; Baosen Zhou
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-18

10.  Diagnostic prediction of complex diseases using phase-only correlation based on virtual sample template.

Authors:  Shu-Lin Wang; Yaping Fang; Jianwen Fang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.