Literature DB >> 18543374

Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.

S Georgsson Ohman1, U Waldenström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate, in a large nationwide Swedish sample, pregnant women's expectations of the routine second-trimester ultrasound examination, with participants expressing themselves in their own words, and to determine whether they had been given sufficient information about why and how the examination was performed, and about possible risks. We focused specifically on reasons for women not having a positive experience.
METHOD: Of 4600 eligible Swedish-speaking women, 3061 were recruited to the study in early pregnancy, during three 1-week periods spread evenly over 1 year (1999-2000), and these women completed a questionnaire at a mean of 16 weeks' gestation. A follow-up questionnaire at 2 months after delivery was completed by 2730 women. The representativeness of the sample was assessed by comparison with the total Swedish birth cohort of 1999.
RESULTS: The most prominent expectation about the up-coming scan was confirmation that the baby was well, followed by confirmation that the pregnancy was real. Detailed information, such as date of delivery and sex of the baby, was mentioned less often, and very few wrote about the examination as an exciting and joyful experience. After the birth, a large majority was satisfied with information about why (88%) and how (87%) the examination was performed, but only 58% said they had received sufficient information about possible risks. 94% had a positive experience of the scan, and those who had not had more ambivalent feelings about their pregnancy. Women with negative feelings about the scan were more often single and of non-Swedish background, and emotional problems were more common in this group.
CONCLUSION: Women's expectations of the routine second-trimester scan differ from those of caregivers, focusing on general reassurance rather than specific information. Level of satisfaction with the scan was high, but information given about risks could be improved. Women with ambivalent or negative feelings about pregnancy may have difficulties enjoying the examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543374     DOI: 10.1002/uog.5273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  17 in total

1.  Swedish University Students' Opinion Regarding Information About Soft Markers.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Peter Lindgren; Karin Nordin; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The Ghanaian woman's experience and perception of ultrasound use in antenatal care.

Authors:  Y B Mensah; K Nkyekyer; K Mensah
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2014-03

3.  Sonographers' communication in obstetrics: Challenges to their professional role and practice in Australia.

Authors:  Samantha Thomas; Kate O'Loughlin; Jillian Clarke
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-11-02

4.  Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Fiona A Lynn; Grainne E Crealey; Fiona A Alderdice; James C McElnay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of expectant women toward routine sonography in pregnancy at Naguru health centre, Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Businge Francis; Byanyima Rosemary
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2009-11-30

6.  Impact of increased risk for fetal aneuploidy on maternal mood: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Dayna L Nevay; Catriona Hippman; Angela Inglis; Arianne Albert; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  The influence of women's fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth.

Authors:  Helen M Haines; Christine Rubertsson; Julie F Pallant; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Attitude of expectant mothers on the use of ultrasound in pregnancy in a tertiary institution in South East of Nigeria.

Authors:  Lc Ikeako; Hu Ezegwui; E Onwudiwe; Jo Enwereji
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-11

10.  Factors affecting the uptake of prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies; a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Pieternel S Verhoeven; Judith Manniën; Linda Martin; Hans S Reinders; Evelien Spelten; Eileen K Hutton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.