Literature DB >> 18543079

The Nottingham prognostic index for invasive carcinoma of the breast.

Andrew H S Lee1, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

A useful prognostic factor in breast cancer has key roles, including identification of a group of patients whose prognosis is so good they do not require further treatment, such as adjuvant systemic therapy, after local surgery, and secondly a group with a poor prognosis for whom additional treatment would be appropriate. To be of clinical use, prognostic factors must show a wide separation in the outcome of the groups identified and select adequate numbers in each group. No single prognostic factor in invasive carcinoma of the breast satisfies all these criteria. However, the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), which combines nodal status, tumour size and histological grade, does satisfy these criteria. The NPI has been validated by further studies in Nottingham and by studies in several other countries. Predictive factors, such as oestrogen receptor and HER-2 status, predict whether a tumour is likely to respond to a treatment, and are complimentary to prognostic factors. The NPI can be used in combination with predictive factors to select patients for systemic adjuvant treatments. There is the potential to improve the NPI by inclusion of other factors, such as vascular invasion, but any such alterations would require further validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543079     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9067-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  13 in total

1.  Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in women with lymph node negative invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A H S Lee; S E Pinder; R D Macmillan; M Mitchell; I O Ellis; C W Elston; R W Blamey
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses.

Authors:  Dalia M Abd El-Rehim; Graham Ball; Sarah E Pinder; Emad Rakha; Claire Paish; John F R Robertson; Douglas Macmillan; Roger W Blamey; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases.

Authors:  C L Carter; C Allen; D E Henson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Prognostic factors: rationale and methods of analysis and integration.

Authors:  G M Clark; S G Hilsenbeck; P M Ravdin; M De Laurentiis; C K Osborne
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Obvious peritumoral emboli: an elusive prognostic factor reappraised. Multivariate analysis of 1320 node-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  I de Mascarel; F Bonichon; M Durand; L Mauriac; G MacGrogan; I Soubeyran; V Picot; A Avril; J M Coindre; M Trojani
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; A B Cruz; R Foster; B Gardner; H Lerner; R Margolese
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

Authors:  I Balslev; C K Axelsson; K Zedeler; B B Rasmussen; B Carstensen; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Occult axillary lymph node metastases are of no prognostic significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  R R Millis; R Springall; A H S Lee; K Ryder; E R C Rytina; I S Fentiman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A prognostic index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Haybittle; R W Blamey; C W Elston; J Johnson; P J Doyle; F C Campbell; R I Nicholson; K Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  [Prognostic and predictive factors of invasive breast cancer: update 2009].

Authors:  T Decker; D Hungermann; W Böcker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Weixiong Dang; Ilana Richman; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven A Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Correlation between Blood Flow Signal of Color Flow Imaging and Nottingham Prognostic Index in Patients with Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Shen; Bing Hu; Ming-Feng Wu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Explaining the difference in prognosis between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

Authors:  P C Allgood; S W Duffy; O Kearins; E O'Sullivan; N Tappenden; M G Wallis; G Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Altered Endoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Pump Expression during Breast Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Béla Papp; Jean-Philippe Brouland
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2011-07-14

7.  Nottingham Prognostic Index in triple-negative breast cancer: a reliable prognostic tool?

Authors:  André Albergaria; Sara Ricardo; Fernanda Milanezi; Vítor Carneiro; Isabel Amendoeira; Daniella Vieira; Jorge Cameselle-Teijeiro; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Assessment of the contribution of the IHC4+C score to decision making in clinical practice in early breast cancer.

Authors:  S Barton; L Zabaglo; R A'Hern; N Turner; T Ferguson; S O'Neill; M Hills; I Smith; M Dowsett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals an association of chromosome 8q22 but not 8p21 imbalance with high grade invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Logan C Walker; Margaret McDonald; J Elisabeth Wells; Gavin C Harris; Bridget A Robinson; Christine M Morris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A simple and reproducible prognostic index in luminal ER-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  I Castellano; L Chiusa; A M Vandone; S Beatrice; M Goia; M Donadio; R Arisio; F Muscarà; A Durando; G Viale; P Cassoni; A Sapino
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.