Literature DB >> 18543075

Personal autonomy and informed consent.

Lars Oystein Ursin1.   

Abstract

Two ways of understanding the notion of autonomy are outlined and discussed in this article, in order to clarify how and if informed consent requirements in biotechnological research are to be justified by the promotion of personal autonomy: A proceduralist conception linking autonomy with authenticity, and a substantivist conception linking autonomy with control. The importance of distinguishing autonomy from liberty is emphasised, which opens for a possible conflict between respecting the freedom and the autonomy of research participants. It is argued that this has implications for how consent requirements based on different criteria of specificity and understanding should be viewed and justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543075     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-008-9144-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  6 in total

1.  Reforming informed consent to genetic research.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Does informed consent to research require comprehension?

Authors:  Gopal Sreenivasan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Informed consent--a contemporary myth?

Authors:  R Lemaire
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

4.  Autonomy, consent and persuasion.

Authors:  Alisdair Maclean
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  2006-12

Review 5.  Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

Authors:  Mats G Hansson; Joakim Dillner; Claus R Bartram; Joyce A Carlson; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Autonomy and negatively informed consent.

Authors:  U Kihlbom
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Biobank research and the right to privacy.

Authors:  Lars Oystein Ursin
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008-10-15

2.  Patients' perceived purpose of clinical informed consent: Mill's individual autonomy model is preferred.

Authors:  Muhammad M Hammami; Eman A Al-Gaai; Yussuf Al-Jawarneh; Hala Amer; Muhammad B Hammami; Abdullah Eissa; Mohammad Al Qadire
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Michael J Young; Yelena G Bodien; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  HUNT for better public health.

Authors:  Steinar Krokstad; Erik R Sund; Kirsti Kvaløy; Vegar Rangul; Marit Næss
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Postal recruitment and consent obtainment from index cases of narcolepsy.

Authors:  Gambo Aliyu; Salah M Mahmud
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.