Literature DB >> 18542745

Sensitivity and specificity of 24-hour urine chemistry levels for detecting elevated calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate supersaturation.

M Adrian Rossi1, Eric A Singer, Dragan J Golijanin, Rebeca D Monk, Erdal Erturk, David A Bushinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The gold standard for determining likelihood of calcium oxalate (CaOx) and calcium phosphate (CaPhos) stone formation in urine is supersaturation of CaOx and CaPhos. Our objective was to investigate whether traditional measurement of total calcium, oxalate and phosphate in a 24-hour urine collection is sufficiently sensitive and specific for detecting elevated supersaturation to preclude the more expensive supersaturation test.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients with nephrolithiasis who underwent measurement of CaOx supersaturation (CaOxSS) and CaPhos supersaturation (CaPhosSS), as well as total calcium, oxalate and phosphate in a 24-hour urine collection. We used various cut-off values to determine sensitivity and specificity of 24-hour urine measurements for detecting elevated CaOxSS and CaPhosSS.
RESULTS: In men and women, the sensitivity of 24-hour calcium for detecting elevated CaOxSS was 71% and 79%, respectively; for oxalate, sensitivity was 59% and 36%, respectively. In men and women, the sensitivity of 24-hour calcium for detecting elevated CaPhosSS was 74% and 88%, respectively; for phosphate, sensitivity was 57% and 8%, respectively. In men and women, the specificity of 24-hour calcium for detecting elevated CaOxSS was 55% and 48%, respectively; it was 60% for detecting elevated CaPhosSS in both men and women.
CONCLUSION: Traditional 24-hour urine analysis is sensitive, but not specific, for detecting elevated CaOxSS and CaPhosSS. Most patients with abnormal 24-hour urine analysis have normal supersaturation, and treatment decisions based on traditional urine analysis would lead to overtreatment in these patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18542745      PMCID: PMC2422914          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  8 in total

1.  Divergence between stone composition and urine supersaturation: clinical and laboratory implications.

Authors:  J Lingeman; R Kahnoski; H Mardis; D S Goldfarb; M Grasso; S Lacy; S J Scheinman; J R Asplin; J H Parks; F L Coe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Proportional reduction of urine supersaturation during nephrolithiasis treatment.

Authors:  F L Coe; H Wise; J H Parks; J R Asplin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prospective study on the efficacy of a selective treatment and risk factors for relapse in recurrent calcium oxalate stone patients.

Authors:  Roswitha Siener; Sara Glatz; Claudia Nicolay; Albrecht Hesse
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Medical reduction of stone risk in a network of treatment centers compared to a research clinic.

Authors:  J Lingeman; H Mardis; R Kahnoski; D S Goldfarb; S Lacy; M Grasso; S J Scheinman; J H Parks; J R Asplin; F L Coe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Supersaturation and stone composition in a network of dispersed treatment sites.

Authors:  J Asplin; J Parks; J Lingeman; R Kahnoski; H Mardis; S Lacey; D Goldfarb; M Grasso; F Coe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Physicochemical aspects of urolithiasis.

Authors:  B Finlayson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Correspondence between stone composition and urine supersaturation in nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  J H Parks; M Coward; F L Coe
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Changes in calcium oxalate crystal morphology as a function of supersaturation.

Authors:  Mauricio Carvalho; Marcos A Vieira
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Is there a better way to work-up kidney stones?

Authors:  Kenneth Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.