Literature DB >> 18542741

An analysis of preoperative delays prior to radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Quebec.

Nader Fahmy1, Wassim Kassouf, Suganthiny Jeyaganth, Moamen Amin, Salaheddin Mahmud, Jordan Steinberg, Simon Tanguay, Armen Aprikian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The province of Quebec has the highest incidence of urothelial tumours in Canada. Radical cystectomy remains the standard treatment for invasive bladder cancer. We have previously observed that prolonged delays between transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) and radical cystectomy lead to worse survival in Quebec.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to characterize the various periods of delay sustained by bladder cancer patients before radical cystectomy across Quebec and to determine their relation to survival.
METHODS: We obtained the billing records for all patients treated with radical cystectomies for bladder cancer across Quebec from 1990 to 2002. Collected information included patient age and sex; dates of family physician (FP) and specialist visits with accompanying diagnoses; dates of cystoscopy, TURBT and CT scanning; surgeon age; surgical volume and dates of death.
RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 25 862 visits for 1633 patients. Median diagnostic delays from FP to specialist, then to cystoscopy, then to TURBT and finally from TURBT to CT were 20, 11, 4 and 14 days, respectively, over the entire study period. Median overall delay from FP visit to radical cystectomy was 93 days. In addition, median FP to radical cystectomy delay progressively increased from 1990 to 2000 from 58 to 120 days (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses showed that patients with an overall delay of either < 25 or > 84 days had a 2.1 and 1.4 times increased risk of dying, respectively (p </= 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative delays have been progressively increasing over time. Overall, delays from FP to radical cystectomy of < 25 and > 84 days may translate into worse outcomes. Poor survival in cases with < 25 days delay may be attributed to case selection, with more advanced cases being managed much quicker. Poor survival in cases with delays of > 84 days may be attributed to disease progression while awaiting completion of management.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18542741      PMCID: PMC2422906          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  21 in total

Review 1.  The dangers of a long urological waiting list.

Authors:  M C Bishop
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1990-05

2.  An interval longer than 12 weeks between the diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy is associated with worse outcome in bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo F Sánchez-Ortiz; William C Huang; Rosemarie Mick; Keith N Van Arsdalen; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Does the option of the ileal neobladder stimulate patient and physician decision toward earlier cystectomy?

Authors:  R E Hautmann; T Paiss
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Surgery and adjunctive chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Derek Raghavan; David Quinn; Donald G Skinner; John P Stein
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Effect of preoperative delay on survival in patients with bladder cancer undergoing cystectomy in Quebec: a population based study.

Authors:  Salaheddin M Mahmud; Brian Fong; Nader Fahmy; Simon Tanguay; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Optimal timing of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Isao Hara; Hideaki Miyake; Shoji Hara; Akinobu Gotoh; Hiroshi Okada; Soichi Arakawa; Sadao Kamidono
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  A study of the morbidity, mortality and long-term survival following radical cystectomy and radical radiotherapy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer in Yorkshire.

Authors:  R Chahal; S K Sundaram; R Iddenden; D F Forman; P M T Weston; S C W Harrison
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Presenting symptoms, treatment delay and survival in bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Mommsen; J Aagaard; A Sell
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1983

9.  An integrated haematuria clinic.

Authors:  A B Paul; D A Collie; S R Wild; G D Chisholm
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1993 May-Jun

10.  Cystectomy delay more than 3 months from initial bladder cancer diagnosis results in decreased disease specific and overall survival.

Authors:  Cheryl T Lee; Rabii Madii; Stephanie Daignault; Rodney L Dunn; Yingxi Zhang; James E Montie; David P Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  Invasive bladder cancer: time is of the essence.

Authors:  Yves Fradet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Urologist referral delay and its impact on survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  F Santos; A Dragomir; W Kassouf; E Franco; A Aprikian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Improving patient journey and quality of care: Summary from the second Bladder Cancer Canada-Canadian Urological Association-Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (BCC-CUA-CUOG) bladder cancer quality of care consensus meeting.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Fred Saad; Rodney H Breau; Girish Kulkarni; David M Guttman; Ken Bagshaw; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Fadi Brimo; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Niels Jacobsen; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Alex Zlotta; Neil Fleshner; D Robert Siemens; Peter C Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration and time to cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: An evaluation of transitions between academic and community settings.

Authors:  Tracy L Rose; Allison M Deal; Ethan Basch; Paul A Godley; W Kimryn Rathmell; William Y Kim; Young E Whang; Mary W Dunn; Andrew Wang; Ronald C Chen; Matthew E Nielsen; Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen; Michael E Woods; Angela B Smith; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Survival Outcomes of Early versus Deferred Cystectomy for High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathan C M Wan
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-06-23

6.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on delaying surgery for urothelial carcinoma of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for the COVID19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Wei Shen Tan; Wei Phin Tan; Teck Wei Tan; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Kari A O Tikkinen; Ashish Kamat; Shomik Sengupta; Maxwell V Meng; Shahrokh Shariat; Morgan Roupret; Karel Decaestecker; Nikhil Vasdev; Yew Lam Chong; Dmitry Enikeev; Gianluca Giannarini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.