Literature DB >> 18542074

Detection of drug-sensitizing EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations in salivary gland carcinoma.

R Dahse1, H Kosmehl.   

Abstract

Activating mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) identify lung adenocarcinoma patients with improved clinical responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib. By screening salivary gland carcinoma, two drug-sensitizing EGFR exon 19 delE746-A750 mutations were identified in an adenocystic and in a mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18542074      PMCID: PMC2453031          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Recent studies (Lynch ; Paez ; Eberhard ; Riely ) have identified a subset of lung cancer patients with rapid and durable clinical responses to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (i.e. gefitinib, erlotinib) and found an underlying association between activating mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain and therapy response. Two mutations account for approximately 90% of EGFR mutations reported to date in lung adenocarcinoma (Pan ). An in-frame deletion of 9–24 nucleotides in exon 19 centred around codons 746–750 makes up about 50% of mutations. The second most common mutation is a point mutation at nucleotide 2573 (CTG to CGG) in exon 21 that results in the substitution of leucine by arginine at codon 858 (L858R). Organotypical salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) have a comparable embryonal tissue origin to lung adenocarcinoma. Epidermal growth factor receptor has been shown to be overexpressed in both salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and non-ACC (Agulnik ). We hypothesised that EGFR-activating mutations in SGC might occur, making EGFR a potential molecular target for therapy also in these rare tumours with poor prognosis and limited response to traditional chemotherapies.

Materials and methods

Samples and DNA isolation

Formalin-fixed tumour samples were obtained from 25 patients (16 males and 9 females with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years) treated at the HELIOS Clinical Center Erfurt, Germany, with the histopathological diagnosis of a SGC according to the WHO classification (Barnes ). The study cohort consisted of ACC (n=11), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n=6), epithelial–myoepithelial carcinoma (n=6) and acinic cell carcinoma (n=2). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, as adopted by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland. Heterozygous mutant control DNA was extracted from lung cancer cell lines NCI-H-1650 and NCI-H-1975 (American Type Culture Collection, LGC Promochem, Wesel, Germany), which contain the exon 19 E746_A750 deletion and the exon 21 L 858R point mutation, respectively. DNA was isolated from microdissected tumour areas using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany).

Exon 19 E746_A750del and exon 21 L 858R point mutation detection assays

Mutation screening was performed by two allele-specific PCR assays and discrimination of the allele-specific PCR fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis. For detecting the exon 19 deletion, a so-called Bi-PASA assay was used with allele-specific primers, which can detect both possible nucleotide deletions (c.2235_2249del15 and c.2236_2250del15) that give rise to an E746_A750del protein change. Exon 21L 858R was screened by allele-specific PCR (Dahse ).

Sequencing

The EGFR mutations were confirmed by genomic DNA sequencing of the relevant regions of exon 19. PCR products were purified with the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen GmbH). Genomic sequencing (MWG Biotech, Martinsried, Germany) was performed using the appropriate downstream PCR primer.

Results

DNA was isolated from microdissected areas of 25 SGCs (obtained by biopsy or surgical resection) and screened for the both most common EGFR-activating mutations. The mutant exon 21 2573G allele was not detectable. We identified two exon 19 E746_A750 deletions. Genomic sequencing confirmed both exon 19 deletions to be the variant c.2235_2249del15 (Figure 1). Case 1 was a 54-year-old female patient with a mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the left parotid gland grade 2, case 2 was a 69-year-old male patient with an ACC of solid type of the right parotid gland.
Figure 1

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation screening in malignant salivary gland tumours. (A) Exon 19 E746_A750 deletion Bi-PASA assay. The Exon 19 deletion is detected by an allele-specific 134 bp fragment (arrow). It is seen in the positive control (NCI-H-1650, lane 2) and was found in a mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the left parotid gland (lane 5) and in an adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of solid type of the right parotid gland (lane 6). No deletions were detected in other malignant tumours (lane 7: ACC; lanes 8 and 9: mucoepidermoid carcinoma; lane 10: acinic cell carcinoma). Lane 1: molecular weight marker; lane 3: wild-type DNA control, lane 4: no template PCR control (water). (B) Part of the wild-type (wt) EGFR exon 2 genomic sequence. The 15 bp deletion is schematically depicted (mut). (C) Genomic sequencing of EGFR exon 2 in both SGC tumour samples harbouring the deletion c.2235_2249del15. (D) Exon 21 L858R allele-specific PCR assay. Left figure: the wild-type-specific PCR fragment was detected in all tumour samples (lanes 5–10), in the heterozygous positive control (NCI-H-1975, lane 2) and in the wild-type DNA control (lane 3). Right figure: the mutant G 2573G allele is amplified only in the positive control and was not found in the tumour samples.

The exon 19 Bi-PASA assay included a PCR control fragment that was always amplified indicating the integrity of the isolated DNA from microdissected clinical tissue samples.

Discussion

This is the first report of the detection of an EGFR hot-spot mutation (known from lung cancer to be correlated to gefitinib/erlotinib therapy sensitivity) in SGCs. Approximately 10–30% of lung carcinoma contain EGFR mutations (Yatabe and Mitsudomi, 2007). Retrospective studies found that after treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib, lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions had a longer overall survival when compared with patients with EGFR L858R (Jackman ; Riely ). It is known that EGFR mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain are seldom acquired in the cancers of other organs (EGFR mutation database: http://www.cityofhope.org/cmdl/egfr%5Fdb/). We detected in 2 out of 25 SGC (8%/95% exact confidence limit: 1.4–27.5%) the recurrent delE746-A750 mutation known from lung cancer. Salivary gland carcinomas are treated mainly with surgery and radiation, and response rates to conventional chemotherapy are generally low. Given this, patients with SGC might profit from trials of investigational new therapies. C-kit is overexpressed in a wide percentage of SGCs, but clinical trials with single-agent imatinib have been negative. ErbB1 and ErbB2 are also frequently overexpressed in salivary gland cancers and this has provided the rationale for clinical trials with trastuzumab, cetuximab, gefitinib and lapatinib. Twenty-nine patients with incurable SGCs were accrued in a phase II trial of gefitinib, an orally active ErbB1-inhibitor. Gefitinib was associated with a 53% stable disease rate (10/19) in ACC, which was maintained for 16 weeks in 26% (5/19) of the patients in this cohort. Cetuximab (Erbitux, C225), a human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody to ErbB1, has been tested in a phase II study in 30 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SGCs. Among 22 patients evaluable for response after at least 3 months of treatment, 11 patients had stable disease, 9 had progressive disease, while 2 patients refused to continue after 1 month (Milano ). In a phase II study of lapatinib in EGFR and/or erbB2-expressing SGCs, the antitumour effects appeared mainly cytostatic (Agulnik ). In conclusion, the presence of EGFR-activating mutations in SGCs might identify patients that would profit from tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. On the other hand, those patients with an EGFR-activating mutation would not benefit from the competitive inhibition of EGF on its receptor. The identification of EGFR-activating mutations is essential for the selection of the EGFR-targeting therapy strategy (receptor-specific antibody vs tyrosine kinase inhibitor). Because the growth factor signal is generated in the mutated receptor itself, a prereceptor blocking of the ligand has no specific effect. A maximal effect is yielded by blocking the signalling pathways downstream of the receptor. Our finding of the presence of activating EGFR mutations in SGCs should initiate further studies on other more rare kinase domain mutations that are known to be associated with drug sensitivity (G719A/C point mutation in exon 18 and L861Q in exon 21).
  10 in total

1.  Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib.

Authors:  David M Jackman; Beow Y Yeap; Lecia V Sequist; Neal Lindeman; Alison J Holmes; Victoria A Joshi; Daphne W Bell; Mark S Huberman; Balazs Halmos; Michael S Rabin; Daniel A Haber; Thomas J Lynch; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib.

Authors:  David A Eberhard; Bruce E Johnson; Lukas C Amler; Audrey D Goddard; Sherry L Heldens; Roy S Herbst; William L Ince; Pasi A Jänne; Thomas Januario; David H Johnson; Pam Klein; Vincent A Miller; Michael A Ostland; David A Ramies; Dragan Sebisanovic; Jeremy A Stinson; Yu R Zhang; Somasekar Seshagiri; Kenneth J Hillan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Rapid polymerase chain reaction-based detection of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Qiulu Pan; William Pao; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 4.  Recent advances in the treatment of salivary gland cancers: emphasis on molecular targeted therapy.

Authors:  Amalia Milano; Francesco Longo; Maria Basile; Rosario V Iaffaioli; Francesco Caponigro
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Two allele-specific PCR assays for screening epidermal growth factor receptor gene hotspot mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Regine Dahse; Alexander Berndt; Anne-Kristin Dahse; Hartwig Kosmehl
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.952

6.  Phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor and/or erbB2 expressing adenoid cystic carcinoma and non adenoid cystic carcinoma malignant tumors of the salivary glands.

Authors:  Mark Agulnik; Ezra W E Cohen; Roger B Cohen; Eric X Chen; Everett E Vokes; Sebastien J Hotte; Eric Winquist; Scott Laurie; D Neil Hayes; Janet E Dancey; Shirley Brown; Gregory R Pond; Ian Lorimer; Manijeh Daneshmand; James Ho; Ming-Sound Tsao; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.

Authors:  J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

Authors:  Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancers.

Authors:  Yasushi Yatabe; Tetsuya Mitsudomi
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.534

10.  Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib.

Authors:  Gregory J Riely; William Pao; Duykhanh Pham; Allan R Li; Naiyer Rizvi; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Merrill S Kies; Bonnie S Glisson; Michael E Kupferman; Diane D Liu; J Jack Lee; Adel K El-Naggar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; George R Blumenschein
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Unfavorable prognosis of CRTC1-MAML2 positive mucoepidermoid tumors with CDKN2A deletions.

Authors:  Sarah L Anzick; Wei-Dong Chen; Yoonsoo Park; Paul Meltzer; Diana Bell; Adel K El-Naggar; Frederic J Kaye
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Aberrations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in 958 patients with diverse advanced tumors: implications for therapy.

Authors:  J J Wheler; G S Falchook; A M Tsimberidou; D S Hong; A Naing; S A Piha-Paul; S S Chen; S Fu; B Stephen; J Y Fok; F Janku; R Kurzrock
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Activation of the EGFR/ERK pathway in high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the salivary glands.

Authors:  B Lujan; S Hakim; S Moyano; A Nadal; M Caballero; A Diaz; A Valera; M Carrera; A Cardesa; L Alos
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Molecular genetic studies on EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ALK, PIK3CA, PDGFRA, and DDR2 in primary pulmonary adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhen Huo; Huanwen Wu; Shanqing Li; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  High-throughput profiling identifies clinically actionable mutations in salivary duct carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Mi Ku; Hyun Ae Jung; Jong-Mu Sun; Young Hyeh Ko; Han-Sin Jeong; Young-Ik Son; Chung-Hwan Baek; Keunchil Park; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Clinical use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of patients with primary and secondary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaolin Sun; Weiqing Gu; Hui Yuan; Siyun Wang; Yang Yang; Laura Evangelista; Liyan Zhang; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08

8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain mutations are rare in salivary gland carcinomas.

Authors:  R Dahse; O Driemel; S Schwarz; J Dahse; K Kromeyer-Hauschild; A Berndt; H Kosmehl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Bronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report.

Authors:  Alessandro G Fois; Gabriella Diana; Antonella Arcadu; Viviana Marras; Paola Crivelli; Carlo Putzu; Giorgio C Ginesu; Sara Canu; Pietro Pirina
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-01-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.