Literature DB >> 18541188

Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.

Roy C Baron1, Barbara K Rimer, Ralph J Coates, Jon Kerner, Geetika P Kalra, Stephanie Melillo, Nancy Habarta, Katherine M Wilson, Sajal Chattopadhyay, Kimberly Leeks.   

Abstract

Most major medical organizations recommend routine screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Screening can lead to early detection of these cancers, resulting in reduced mortality. Yet not all people who should be screened are screened, either regularly or, in some cases, ever. This report presents the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, economic efficiency, barriers to implementation, and other harms or benefits of interventions designed to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by increasing community access to these services. Evidence from these reviews indicates that screening for breast cancer (by mammography) has been increased effectively by reducing structural barriers and by reducing out-of pocket client costs, and that screening for colorectal cancer (by fecal occult blood test) has been increased effectively by reducing structural barriers. Additional research is needed to determine whether screening for cervical cancer (by Pap test) can be increased by reducing structural barriers and by reducing out-of-pocket costs, whether screening for colorectal cancer (fecal occult blood test) can be increased by reducing out-of-pocket costs, and whether these interventions are effective in increasing the use of other colorectal cancer screening procedures (i.e., flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema). Specific areas for further research are also suggested in this report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18541188     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  58 in total

1.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

Review 3.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.

Authors:  John Harvey Wingfield; Tabia Henry Akintobi; DeBran Jacobs; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

5.  Using organizational network analysis to plan cancer screening programs for vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; Bobbi J Carothers; Aisha K Lofters
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Appalachian women's perspectives on breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Tina M Kruger; Shoshana Bardach; Britteny M Howell
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Perkins; Yan Tong; Connie Krier; Victoria L Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jeffrey K Springston; Thomas F Imperiale; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Christen L Lara; Kelly L Means; Krystal D Morwood; Westley R Lighthall; Sonja Hoover; Florence K L Tangka; Cynthia French; Krystal D Gayle; Amy DeGroff; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Evidence-based interventions and screening recommendations for colorectal cancer in comprehensive cancer control plans: a content analysis.

Authors:  Julie S Townsend; Lisa C Richardson; C Brooke Steele; Dana E White
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.