Literature DB >> 18540701

Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in short femoropopliteal arterial stenoses.

Antonio R Cotroneo1, Danilo Pascali, Roberto Iezzi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare midterm results of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) to conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of short femoropopliteal arterial stenosis.
METHODS: Between February 2004 and June 2006, 84 consecutive patients (49 men; mean age 68.5 years, range 53-89) with a total of 142 focal (<3 cm), calcified femoropopliteal occlusive lesions underwent endovascular treatment via an antegrade approach: 40 patients (67 lesions) were treated with PTA and 44 patients (75 lesions) underwent CBA. Follow-up consisted of clinical examination and color duplex ultrasonography at intervals to 2 years.
RESULTS: All treatments were technically successfully, without any major complication. In 4 (6%) of 67 lesions treated with PTA, a self-expanding stent was implanted due to a flow-limiting dissection; no patient treated with CBA had recoil, dissection, or arterial tears requiring stent placement. In the PTA group, primary and secondary patency rates, respectively, were 91.0% and 95.5% at 6 months, 83.1% and 92.4% at 12 months, and 66.6% and 76.5% at 2 years. In the CBA patients, the primary and secondary patency rates, respectively, were 93.2% and 95.9% at 6 months, 90.4% (p<0.001 versus PTA at same interval) and 94.5% at 12 months, and 79.7% (p<0.001) and 85.6% (p<0.001) at 2 years.
CONCLUSION: CBA seems to be a valuable tool in the endovascular treatment of short femoropopliteal stenotic lesions, achieving better patency at midterm compared to conventional PTA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18540701     DOI: 10.1583/08-2366.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

Review 1.  An overview of optimal endovascular strategy in treating the femoropopliteal artery: mechanical, biological, and procedural factors.

Authors:  Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-03

2.  Instent restenosis after carotid stenting: treatment using an off-label cardiac scoring balloon.

Authors:  Grant C Sorkin; Travis M Dumont; Jorge L Eller; Maxim Mokin; L Nelson Hopkins; Kenneth V Snyder; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-05

3.  State-of-the-Art Endovascular Therapies for the Femoropopliteal Segment: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ramya C Mosarla; Ehrin Armstrong; Yonatan Bitton-Faiwiszewski; Peter A Schneider; Eric A Secemsky
Journal:  J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv       Date:  2022-08-20

4.  Treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions with scoring and drug-coated balloon angioplasty: 12-month results of the DCB-Trak registry.

Authors:  Magnus Baumhäkel; Shalva Chkhetia; Michael Kindermann
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 5.  [Interventional Treatments for Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease and Recent Updates].

Authors:  Minuk Kim; Soo Buem Cho
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.