Literature DB >> 18540236

Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results.

Huib Cornielje1, Johan P Velema, Harry Finkenflügel.   

Abstract

Although Community Based Rehabilitation has now formally existed for almost 30 years, few papers have been written about the results of this approach. The authors hope to contribute with this paper towards methodologies that will help to measure results of Community Based Rehabilitation programmes. The importance of establishing--prior to the development of Community Based Rehabilitation--an extensive baseline has not been extensively covered as the importance of it is almost self-evident; yet the lack of baseline data often severely hampers the possibility of being able to measure the effects of Community Based Rehabilitation. The article places considerable importance on management information systems and monitoring, since it is believed that evaluation will greatly benefit from both the existence of baseline data as well as a well-developed and well-implemented information system. The present article emphasises the need for participatory processes in the development of baseline data and information systems. Four key areas for measuring CBR are highlighted: people, power, public society and partnerships. Finally, a tool is presented in order to evaluate (or monitoring and evaluation) systematically. What gets measured gets done; If you don't measure results, you can't tell success from failure; If you can't see success, you can't reward it; If you can't reward success, you're probably rewarding failure; If you can't see success, you can't learn from it; If you can't recognize failure, you can't correct it; If you can demonstrate results, you can win public support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18540236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lepr Rev        ISSN: 0305-7518            Impact factor:   0.537


  7 in total

1.  Ethics and Community-Based Rehabilitation: Eight Ethical Questions from a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephen Clarke; Jessica Barudin; Matthew Hunt
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  The impact of hospital-based and community based models of cerebral palsy rehabilitation: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Jermaine M Dambi; Jennifer Jelsma
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Promoting good policy for leadership and governance of health related rehabilitation: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne McVeigh; Malcolm MacLachlan; Brynne Gilmore; Chiedza McClean; Arne H Eide; Hasheem Mannan; Priscille Geiser; Antony Duttine; Gubela Mji; Eilish McAuliffe; Beth Sprunt; Mutamad Amin; Charles Normand
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.185

4.  Can propensity score matching be applied to cross-sectional data to evaluate Community-Based Rehabilitation? Results of a survey implementing the WHO's Community-Based Rehabilitation indicators in Vietnam.

Authors:  Catherine Mason; Carla Sabariego; Đoàn Mạnh Thắng; Jörg Weber
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  A systematic review on how to conduct evaluations in community-based rehabilitation.

Authors:  Marie Grandisson; Michèle Hébert; Rachel Thibeault
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Stakeholder consultations on community-based rehabilitation guidelines in Ghana and Uganda.

Authors:  Mary Wickenden; Diane Mulligan; Gertrude O Fefoame; Phoebe Katende
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2012-10-03

7.  Development of indicators for monitoring Community-Based Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Catherine Mason; Joerg Weber; Seryan Atasoy; Carla Sabariego; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.