Literature DB >> 18539936

A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis.

Dianne H Glass1, Cynthia J Roberts, Alan S Litsky, Paul A Weber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a method for evaluating viscosity and elasticity of the cornea and to examine the effect that both properties have on hysteresis.
METHODS: A three-component spring and dashpot model was created in Simulink in Matlab to represent the purely elastic and viscoelastic behavior of the cornea during a measurement using device called an ocular response analyzer (ORA). Values for elasticity and viscosity were varied while sinusoidal stress was applied to the model. The simulated stresses were used to determine how hysteresis is affected by the individual components of elasticity, viscosity, and maximum stress. To validate the model, high-speed photography was used to measure induced strain in a corneal phantom during ORA measurement. This measured strain was compared with the strains simulated by the model.
RESULTS: When the spring in the viscoelastic portion of the model was stiffened, hysteresis decreased. When the spring in the purely elastic element was stiffened, hysteresis increased. If both springs were stiffened together, hysteresis peaked strongly as a function of the viscosity of the viscoelastic element. Below the peak value, lower elasticity was associated with higher hysteresis. Above the peak value, higher elasticity was associated with higher hysteresis. In addition, hysteresis increased as the air maximum pressure was increased. Measurements from phantom corresponded to predictions from the model.
CONCLUSIONS: A viscoelastic model is presented to illustrate how changing viscosity and elasticity may affect hysteresis. Low hysteresis can be associated with either high elasticity or low elasticity, depending on the viscosity, a finding consistent with clinical reports.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539936     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  48 in total

1.  Correlation between biomechanical responses of posterior sclera and IOP elevations during micro intraocular volume change.

Authors:  Hugh J Morris; Junhua Tang; Benjamin Cruz Perez; Xueliang Pan; Richard T Hart; Paul A Weber; Jun Liu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.

Authors:  Iben Bach Pedersen; Sashia Bak-Nielsen; Anders Højslet Vestergaard; Anders Ivarsen; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  THz imaging system for in vivo human cornea.

Authors:  Shijun Sung; Skyler Selvin; Neha Bajwa; Somporn Chantra; Bryan Nowroozi; James Garritano; Jacob Goell; Alex Li; Sophie X Deng; Elliott Brown; Warren S Grundfest; Zachary D Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Terahertz Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.274

4.  Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Maria Gkika; Georgios Labiris; Athanassios Giarmoukakis; Anna Koutsogianni; Vassilios Kozobolis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties, optic nerve head topographic parameters, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in diabetic and non-diabetic primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Serkan Akkaya; Ertuğrul Can; Faruk Öztürk
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Corneal hysteresis in patients with dry eye.

Authors:  P G Firat; S Doganay
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Association between Rates of Visual Field Progression and Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Different Tonometers.

Authors:  Bianca N Susanna; Nara G Ogata; Fábio B Daga; Carolina N Susanna; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  In Vivo Noninvasive Measurement of Young's Modulus of Elasticity in Human Eyes: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Arthur J Sit; Shuai-Chun Lin; Arash Kazemi; Jay W McLaren; Christopher M Pruet; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  THz and mm-Wave Sensing of Corneal Tissue Water Content: Electromagnetic Modeling and Analysis.

Authors:  Zachary D Taylor; James Garritano; Shijun Sung; Neha Bajwa; David B Bennett; Bryan Nowroozi; Priyamvada Tewari; James Sayre; Jean-Pierre Hubschman; Sophie Deng; Elliott R Brown; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  IEEE Trans Terahertz Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.274

10.  Mapping in-vivo optic nerve head strains caused by intraocular and intracranial pressures.

Authors:  H Tran; J Grimm; B Wang; M A Smith; A Gogola; S Nelson; E Tyler-Kabara; J Schuman; G Wollstein; I A Sigal
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.