Literature DB >> 18539824

Effects of sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance in group-housed weanling pigs.

A Sterk1, P Schlegel, A J Mul, M Ubbink-Blanksma, E M A M Bruininx.   

Abstract

To assess the effects of 2 high intensity sodium saccharine-based sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance of group-housed weaned pigs, one hundred ninety-eight 26-d-old weanling pigs were given ad libitum access to 3 dietary treatments containing: no additional sweetener (control), 150 mg of sweetener (Sucram C-150)/kg, or 150 mg of sweetener (Sucram 3D)/kg. At weaning, piglets were allocated to 18 pens (11 pigs/pen) based on BW, sex, and ancestry, and pens were randomly assigned to 3 treatments with 6 pens per treatment. The pens were equipped with computerized feeding stations. During the first 12 d, pigs were offered pelleted prestarter diets that were replaced at once by pelleted starter diets for the last 7 d of the 19-d experimental period. The individual feed intake characteristics consisting of latency time (interval between weaning and first feed intake), initial feed intake (intake during the first 24 h following the first feed intake), the number of total visits per day, and the number of visits in which feed was consumed, together with the time and the feed intake per visit, were determined for all piglets. Performance traits and fecal consistency were determined per pen for d 0 to 5, d 5 to 12, and d 12 to 19, as well as for the total period (d 0 to 19). The initiation of feed intake was not affected by the addition of high intensity sweeteners to the diet. From 12 d postweaning, dietary sweeteners caused the piglets to focus more on feed intake and less on exploratory behavior, as shown by the increased percentage of visits with feed intake in pigs fed the Sucram 3D diet compared with those fed the control diet (P = 0.002). The overall daily feed intake increased with time but was not affected by the addition of sweeteners. Nevertheless, dietary sweeteners prevented the depression of feed intake on d 8 and 10 postweaning (d 8, P = 0.013; d 10, P = 0.014), which seemed to coincide with an improved fecal consistency score (d 5 to 12, P = 0.11; d 12 to 19, P < 0.001). However, the changes in feed intake characteristics and fecal consistency only resulted in numerical effects on postweaning pig performance (ADFI, P = 0.126; ADG, P = 0.140). The results of the present study indicate that weanling pigs need a certain period of time before clear effects of dietary sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and pig performance can be observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539824     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity.

Authors:  Michelle Pearlman; Jon Obert; Lisa Casey
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-11-21

Review 2.  Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: Lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory.

Authors:  Jane Shearer; Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Effects of sweetener sucralose on diet preference, growth performance and hematological and biochemical parameters of weaned piglets.

Authors:  Wenwei Zhang; Holden He; Limin Gong; Wenqing Lai; Bing Dong; Liying Zhang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Consumption of a Natural High-Intensity Sweetener Enhances Activity and Expression of Rabbit Intestinal Na+/Glucose Cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and Improves Colibacillosis-Induced Enteric Disorders.

Authors:  Andrew W Moran; Miran A Al-Rammahi; Kristian Daly; Emeline Grand; Catherine Ionescu; David M Bravo; Emma H Wall; Soraya P Shirazi-Beechey
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 5.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Their Associations with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jarrett Walbolt; Yunsuk Koh
Journal:  J Obes Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Effects of dietary sweeteners supplementation on growth performance, serum biochemicals, and jejunal physiological functions of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Jingle Jiang; Siyi Liu; Tuniyaz Jamal; Tengxin Ding; Lina Qi; Zengpeng Lv; Debing Yu; Fangxiong Shi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.