Literature DB >> 18539668

Simulated joint and muscle forces in reversed and anatomic shoulder prostheses.

A Terrier1, A Reist, F Merlini, A Farron.   

Abstract

Reversed shoulder prostheses are increasingly being used for the treatment of glenohumeral arthropathy associated with a deficient rotator cuff. These non-anatomical implants attempt to balance the joint forces by means of a semi-constrained articular surface and a medialised centre of rotation. A finite element model was used to compare a reversed prosthesis with an anatomical implant. Active abduction was simulated from 0 degrees to 150 degrees of elevation. With the anatomical prosthesis, the joint force almost reached the equivalence of body weight. The joint force was half this for the reversed prosthesis. The direction of force was much more vertically aligned for the reverse prosthesis, in the first 90 degrees of abduction. With the reversed prosthesis, abduction was possible without rotator cuff muscles and required 20% less deltoid force to achieve it. This force analysis confirms the potential mechanical advantage of reversed prostheses when rotator cuff muscles are deficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539668     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.19708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  21 in total

1.  Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Grégory Moineau; Yannick Roussanne; Kieran O'Shea
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty comparing X-rays and computerised tomography.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Matthew Daggett; Yannick Carrillon; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  Going forward with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keshav Singhal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-06

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem.

Authors:  Ehud Atoun; Alexander Van Tongel; Nir Hous; Ali Narvani; Jai Relwani; Ruben Abraham; Ofer Levy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Stress distribution in the humerus during elevation of the arm and external abduction.

Authors:  V Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-04

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty leads to significant biomechanical changes in the remaining rotator cuff.

Authors:  Sebastian Herrmann; Christian König; Markus Heller; Carsten Perka; Stefan Greiner
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Kinematics and EMG activity in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan A Smith; Katherine Woolley; Augustus Mazzocca; Richard Feinn; Mark Cote; Gregg Gomlinski; Juan Garbalosa; Karen M Myrick
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-30

10.  Effect of Rotator Cuff Deficiencies on Muscle Forces and Glenohumeral Contact Force After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Zhenxian Chen; Xunjian Fan; Yongchang Gao; Jing Zhang; Lei Guo; Shibin Chen; Zhongmin Jin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.