Literature DB >> 18538725

Improving the quality of communication in organised cervical cancer screening programmes.

Livia Giordano1, Premila Webster, Charles Anthony, Anne Szarewski, Philip Davies, Marc Arbyn, Nereo Segnan, Joan Austoker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide health professionals involved in cervical cancer screening with an insight into the complex issues relating to communication about screening and to provide a framework for a more effective communication strategy.
METHODS: This paper has been compiled by a multidisciplinary pan-European group of health professionals and cancer advocates from several European screening programmes. European surveys on screening communication, literature reviews and group discussion were used for this purpose.
RESULTS: Information on cervical screening must be accessible, relevant, comprehensible, comprehensive, client-centred, phase-specific and multilevel. An effective communication strategy should consider health professionals' screening knowledge and their communication skills, consumers' health literacy skills and the communication needs of specific sub-groups in the target population. Co-operation between screening professionals, advocacy groups and journalists should be promoted.
CONCLUSION: To communicate effectively and appropriately is a complex task which can be influenced by a number of factors. Screening workers need better information themselves and must take into account the needs and characteristics of the target population. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This document should provide a useful tool to help screening professionals in designing and developing good quality and effective communication strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538725     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  7 in total

1.  Using the word 'cancer' in communication about an abnormal Pap test: finding common ground with patient-provider communication.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Veenu Randhawa; Priya John; Gregory Makoul; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

2.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second edition--summary document.

Authors:  M Arbyn; A Anttila; J Jordan; G Ronco; U Schenck; N Segnan; H Wiener; A Herbert; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Knowledge about cervical cancer, pap test and barriers towards cervical screening of women in Turkey.

Authors:  Emre Yanikkerem; Asli Goker; Nicole Piro; Serife Dikayak; Faik Mumtaz Koyuncu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening - a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Szarewski; L Cadman; D Mesher; J Austin; L Ashdown-Barr; R Edwards; D Lyons; J Walker; J Christison; A Frater; J Waller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Knowledge, awareness and attitudes about cervical cancer among women attending or not an HIV treatment center in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Chanvilay Sichanh; Fabrice Quet; Phetsavanh Chanthavilay; Joeffroy Diendere; Vatthanaphone Latthaphasavang; Christophe Longuet; Yves Buisson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  General practitioners can increase participation in cervical cancer screening - a model program in Hungary.

Authors:  Anikó Gyulai; Attila Nagy; Vera Pataki; Dóra Tonté; Róza Ádány; Zoltán Vokó
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.