BACKGROUND: We monitored the surface level cleanliness in a 5-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) over a 10-week period to evaluate proposed hygiene standards. METHODS: Ten environmental sites within the SICU were sampled twice weekly, along with collection of clinical and patient activity data. The standards designate aerobic colony counts (ACCs) > 2.5 colony-forming units/cm(2) from hand-touch sites and the presence of Staphylococcus aureus as indicating hygiene failure. RESULTS: Nearly 25% of the 200 samples analyzed did not meet the standards, mostly from hand-touch sites on curtains, beds, and medical equipment. The total number of failures each week was associated with bed occupancy (P = .04), with a trend toward association with SICU-acquired infection (P = .11). Environmental S aureus was associated with the proportion of beds occupied (P = .02). Indistinguishable genotypes were found between patient and environmental staphylococci, with time scales supporting staphylococcal transmission in both directions. CONCLUSIONS: Hygiene standards based on microbial growth levels and the presence of S aureus reflect patient activity and provide a means to risk-manage infection. They also expose a staphylococcal reservoir that could represent a more tangible risk to patients. Standards for surface level cleanliness merit further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: We monitored the surface level cleanliness in a 5-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) over a 10-week period to evaluate proposed hygiene standards. METHODS: Ten environmental sites within the SICU were sampled twice weekly, along with collection of clinical and patient activity data. The standards designate aerobic colony counts (ACCs) > 2.5 colony-forming units/cm(2) from hand-touch sites and the presence of Staphylococcus aureus as indicating hygiene failure. RESULTS: Nearly 25% of the 200 samples analyzed did not meet the standards, mostly from hand-touch sites on curtains, beds, and medical equipment. The total number of failures each week was associated with bed occupancy (P = .04), with a trend toward association with SICU-acquired infection (P = .11). Environmental S aureus was associated with the proportion of beds occupied (P = .02). Indistinguishable genotypes were found between patient and environmental staphylococci, with time scales supporting staphylococcal transmission in both directions. CONCLUSIONS: Hygiene standards based on microbial growth levels and the presence of S aureus reflect patient activity and provide a means to risk-manage infection. They also expose a staphylococcal reservoir that could represent a more tangible risk to patients. Standards for surface level cleanliness merit further evaluation.
Authors: Gerardo U Lopez; Masaaki Kitajima; Aaron Havas; Charles P Gerba; Kelly A Reynolds Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Michael G Schmidt; Hubert H Attaway; Peter A Sharpe; Joseph John; Kent A Sepkowitz; Andrew Morgan; Sarah E Fairey; Susan Singh; Lisa L Steed; J Robert Cantey; Katherine D Freeman; Harold T Michels; Cassandra D Salgado Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ethan E Mann; Dipankar Manna; Michael R Mettetal; Rhea M May; Elisa M Dannemiller; Kenneth K Chung; Anthony B Brennan; Shravanthi T Reddy Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Jean Gaudart; Elaine Cloutman-Green; Serge Guillas; Nikki D'Arcy; John C Hartley; Vanya Gant; Nigel Klein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 3.240