Literature DB >> 18538304

Prospective and positive mental imagery deficits in dysphoria.

Emily A Holmes1, Tamara J Lang, Michelle L Moulds, Ann M Steele.   

Abstract

We know less about positive mental imagery than we do about negative mental imagery in depression. This study examined the relationship between depressed mood and the subjective experience of emotion in imagined events; specifically, prospective imagery, and imagery in response to emotionally ambiguous stimuli. One hundred and twenty-six undergraduates completed measures of depression, imagery vividness for future events, and a homograph interpretation task in which they generated images and subsequently rated image pleasantness and vividness. As predicted, compared to low dysphoria, high dysphoria was associated with poorer ability to vividly imagine positive (but not negative) future events. These findings were augmented by the observation that high dysphorics provided lower pleasantness ratings of images generated in response to homographs they interpreted as positive. We suggest that an imbalance in the inability to vividly imagine positive but not negative future events may curtail the ability of high dysphorics to be optimistic. High dysphoric individuals are further disadvantaged: even when they interpret ambiguity positively, the resulting images they generate are associated with less positive affect. Therapeutic strategies that address both such positive-specific imagery biases hold promise for depression treatment innovation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538304     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  45 in total

1.  Enhancing memory and imagination improves problem solving among individuals with depression.

Authors:  Craig P McFarland; Mark Primosch; Chelsey M Maxson; Brandon T Stewart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

2.  Thinking about the past and future in daily life: an experience sampling study of individual differences in mental time travel.

Authors:  Roger E Beaty; Paul Seli; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-20

3.  The effect of induced optimism on the optimistic update bias.

Authors:  Shinpei Yoshimura; Yuma Hashimoto
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2020-03-29

4.  Greater positive affect change after mental imagery than verbal thinking in a student sample.

Authors:  Sabine Nelis; Koen Vanbrabant; Emily A Holmes; Filip Raes
Journal:  J Exp Psychopathol       Date:  2012-04-23

5.  The critical role of mental imagery in human emotion: insights from fear-based imagery and aphantasia.

Authors:  Marcus Wicken; Rebecca Keogh; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: a review of imagery measures and a guiding framework.

Authors:  David G Pearson; Catherine Deeprose; Sophie M A Wallace-Hadrill; Stephanie Burnett Heyes; Emily A Holmes
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-11

7.  Mental imagery, emotion and psychopathology across child and adolescent development.

Authors:  S Burnett Heyes; J Y F Lau; E A Holmes
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Cognitive Bias Modification Using Mental Imagery for Depression: Developing a Novel Computerized Intervention to Change Negative Thinking Styles.

Authors:  Tamara J Lang; Simon E Blackwell; Catherine J Harmer; Phil Davison; Emily A Holmes
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2011-11-18

9.  Vividness of visual imagery and incidental recall of verbal cues, when phenomenological availability reflects long-term memory accessibility.

Authors:  Amedeo D'Angiulli; Matthew Runge; Andrew Faulkner; Jila Zakizadeh; Aldrich Chan; Selvana Morcos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

10.  Optimism and mental imagery: a possible cognitive marker to promote well-being?

Authors:  Simon E Blackwell; Nathaly Rius-Ottenheim; Yvonne W M Schulte-van Maaren; Ingrid V E Carlier; Victor D Middelkoop; Frans G Zitman; Philip Spinhoven; Emily A Holmes; Erik J Giltay
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.