Literature DB >> 18538241

Validity of temporomandibular disorder examination procedures for assessment of temporomandibular joint status.

Marc Schmitter1, Bodo Kress, Michael Leckel, Volkmar Henschel, Brigitte Ohlmann, Peter Rammelsberg.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This hypothesis-generating study was performed to determine which items in the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and additional diagnostic tests have the best predictive accuracy for joint-related diagnoses.
METHODS: One hundred forty-nine TMD patients and 43 symptom-free subjects were examined in clinical examinations and with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The importance of each variable of the clinical examination for correct joint-related diagnosis was assessed by using MRI diagnoses. For this purpose, "random forest" statistical software (based on classification trees) was used.
RESULTS: Maximum unassisted jaw opening, maximum assisted jaw opening, history of locked jaw, joint sound with and without compression, joint pain, facial pain, pain on palpation of the lateral pterygoid area, and overjet proved suitable for distinguishing between subtypes of joint-related TMD. Measurement of excursion, protrusion, and midline deviation were less important.
CONCLUSIONS: The validity of clinical TMD examination procedures can be enhanced by using the 16 variables of greatest importance identified in this study. In addition to other variables, maximum unassisted and assisted opening and a history of locked jaw were important when assessing the status of the TMJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538241     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Interobserver variability of dynamic MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  F Molinari; L Gentile; P Manicone; R Ursini; L Raffaelli; M Stefanetti; A D'Addona; T Pirronti; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms.

Authors:  Eric L Schiffman; Richard Ohrbach; Edmond L Truelove; Feng Tai; Gary C Anderson; Wei Pan; Yoly M Gonzalez; Mike T John; Earl Sommers; Thomas List; Ana M Velly; Wenjun Kang; John O Look
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2010

3.  A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.

Authors:  Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos; Peter Rammelsberg; Lydia Eberhard; Marc Schmitter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Correlation of RDC/TMD axis I diagnoses and axis II pain-related disability. A multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniele Manfredini; Jari Ahlberg; Ephraim Winocur; Luca Guarda-Nardini; Frank Lobbezoo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Inter-tester reliability of selected clinical tests for long-lasting temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Elisabeth Heggem Julsvoll; Nina Køpke Vøllestad; Gro Opseth; Hilde Stendal Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-05-14

6.  The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity.

Authors:  Eric L Schiffman; Edmond L Truelove; Richard Ohrbach; Gary C Anderson; Mike T John; Thomas List; John O Look
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2010
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.