Literature DB >> 18537483

Medical students' assessment of education and training in women's health and in sex and gender differences.

Janet B Henrich1, Catherine M Viscoli, Gallane D Abraham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors surveyed U.S. medical students to learn their perceptions of the adequacy of women's health and sex/gender-specific teaching and of their preparedness to care for female patients.
METHODS: Between September 2004 and June 2005, third and fourth year students at the 125 allopathic medical schools received an online survey conducted by the American Medical Women's Association (AMWA). Students rated the extent to which 44 topics were included in curricula from 1 to 4 (1 = no coverage, 4 = in-depth coverage) and their preparedness to perform 27 clinical skills (1 = no preparation, 4 = thorough preparation).
RESULTS: From 101 of the 125 schools, 1267 students responded (mean number of respondents/school = 13, SD 12). The mean curriculum rating (2.53, SD 0.52) indicated brief to moderate coverage of topics. The mean preparedness rating was higher (3.09, SD 0.44), indicating moderate preparedness. In a regression model, female student sex and site of an AMWA chapter were associated with lower mean combined curriculum and preparedness ratings (female 2.76, male 3.01, p < 0.001; AMWA 2.77, non-AMWA 2.89, p < 0.001), whereas other school characteristics (female dean, federally funded women's health program, and proportion of tenured women faculty) had no association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537483      PMCID: PMC2942771          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  18 in total

1.  Medical student self-assessment of performance on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.

Authors:  Rodney K Edwards; Kenneth R Kellner; Christopher L Sistrom; Elizabeth J Magyari
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Sex and gender factors in medical studies: implications for health and clinical practice.

Authors:  Vivian W Pinn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training.

Authors:  M J Gordon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Student evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology: self- versus departmental assessment.

Authors:  W N Herbert; W C McGaghie; W Droegemueller; M H Riddle; K L Maxwell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Medical students' self-assessment accuracy in communication skills.

Authors:  L D Gruppen; J Garcia; C M Grum; J T Fitzgerald; C A White; L Dicken; J C Sisson; A Zweifler
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Interviewing skills: self-evaluation by medical students.

Authors:  D Farnill; S C Hayes; J Todisco
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Medical students' clinical self-assessments: comparisons with external measures of performance and the students' self-assessments of overall performance and effort.

Authors:  J O Woolliscroft; J TenHaken; J Smith; J G Calhoun
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Web-based curriculum. A practical and effective strategy for teaching women's health.

Authors:  Jennifer R Zebrack; Julie L Mitchell; Susan L Davids; Deborah E Simpson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Development of a comprehensive women's health program in an academic medical center: experiences of the Indiana University National Center of Excellence in Women's Health.

Authors:  Rose S Fife
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Women's health education initiatives: why have they stalled?

Authors:  Janet B Henrich
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of a Student-Run Free Clinic's Women's Health Program on Perceived Readiness for Clinical Rotations.

Authors:  Arielle W Fein; Heather L Paladine
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 2.  Women's Health Fellowships: Examining the Potential Benefits and Harms of Accreditation.

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Bennett Vogelman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Perceptions of medical students and their supervisors of the preparation of students for clinical placement in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Patricia Johnson; Patricia Green; Peter Jones; Heather James
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

4.  Auditing sex- and gender-based medicine (SGBM) content in medical school curriculum: a student scholar model.

Authors:  Michael M Song; Betsy G Jones; Robert A Casanova
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 5.  How to Integrate Sex and Gender Medicine into Medical and Allied Health Profession Undergraduate, Graduate, and Post-Graduate Education: Insights from a Rapid Systematic Literature Review and a Thematic Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Rola Khamisy-Farah; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.