Literature DB >> 18536250

Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges.

Luiz A Martinelli1, Solange Filoso.   

Abstract

Several geopolitical factors, aggravated by worries of global warming, have been fueling the search for and production of renewable energy worldwide for the past few years. Such demand for renewable energy is likely to benefit the sugarcane ethanol industry in Brazil, not only because sugarcane ethanol has a positive energetic balance and relatively low production costs, but also because Brazilian ethanol has been successfully produced and used as biofuel in the country since the 1970s. However, environmental and social impacts associated with ethanol production in Brazil can become important obstacles to sustainable biofuel production worldwide. Atmospheric pollution from burning of sugarcane for harvesting, degradation of soils and aquatic systems, and the exploitation of cane cutters are among the issues that deserve immediate attention from the Brazilian government and international societies. The expansion of sugarcane crops to the areas presently cultivated for soybeans also represent an environmental threat, because it may increase deforestation pressure from soybean crops in the Amazon region. In this paper, we discuss environmental and social issues linked to the expansion of sugarcane in Brazil for ethanol production, and we provide recommendations to help policy makers and the Brazilian government establish new initiatives to produce a code for ethanol production that is environmentally sustainable and economically fair. Recommendations include proper planning and environmental risk assessments for the expansion of sugarcane to new regions such as Central Brazil, improvement of land use practices to reduce soil erosion and nitrogen pollution, proper protection of streams and riparian ecosystems, banning of sugarcane burning practices, and fair working conditions for sugarcane cutters. We also support the creation of a more constructive approach for international stakeholders and trade organizations to promote sustainable development for biofuel production in developing countries such as Brazil. Finally, we support the inclusion of environmental values in the price of biofuels in order to discourage excessive replacement of natural ecosystems such as forests, wetlands, and pasture by bioenergy crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536250     DOI: 10.1890/07-1813.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  12 in total

Review 1.  Biogeochemical Research Priorities for Sustainable Biofuel and Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Americas.

Authors:  Hero T Gollany; Brian D Titus; D Andrew Scott; Heidi Asbjornsen; Sigrid C Resh; Rodney A Chimner; Donald J Kaczmarek; Luiz F C Leite; Ana C C Ferreira; Kenton A Rod; Jorge Hilbert; Marcelo V Galdos; Michelle E Cisz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A new distribution range of Ateles chamek (Humboldt 1812) in an ecotone of three biomes in the Paraguay River Basin.

Authors:  Manoel Dos Santos-Filho; Christine Steiner São Bernardo; Henry Willian Van der Laan Barbosa; Almério Câmara Gusmão; Leandro Jerusalinsky; Gustavo Rodrigues Canale
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  A Fish-Based Index of Biotic Integrity for the Assessment of Streams Located in a Sugarcane-Dominated Landscape in Southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Fernanda Bastos dos Santos; Katharina Eichbaum Esteves
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Nitrate paradigm does not hold up for sugarcane.

Authors:  Nicole Robinson; Richard Brackin; Kerry Vinall; Fiona Soper; Jirko Holst; Harshi Gamage; Chanyarat Paungfoo-Lonhienne; Heinz Rennenberg; Prakash Lakshmanan; Susanne Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Changing patterns of health in communities impacted by a bioenergy project in northern Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Astrid M Knoblauch; Mary H Hodges; Mohamed S Bah; Habib I Kamara; Anita Kargbo; Jusufu Paye; Hamid Turay; Emmanuel D Nyorkor; Mark J Divall; Yaobi Zhang; Jürg Utzinger; Mirko S Winkler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Bigger is better: Improved nature conservation and economic returns from landscape-level mitigation.

Authors:  Christina M Kennedy; Daniela A Miteva; Leandro Baumgarten; Peter L Hawthorne; Kei Sochi; Stephen Polasky; James R Oakleaf; Elizabeth M Uhlhorn; Joseph Kiesecker
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Projected climate change impacts in rainfall erosivity over Brazil.

Authors:  André Almagro; Paulo Tarso S Oliveira; Mark A Nearing; Stefan Hagemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prioritizing Crop Management to Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Australian Sugarcane Crops.

Authors:  Peter J Thorburn; Jody S Biggs; Jeda Palmer; Elizabeth A Meier; Kirsten Verburg; Danielle M Skocaj
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Food sovereignty: an alternative paradigm for poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation in Latin America.

Authors:  M Jahi Chappell; Hannah Wittman; Christopher M Bacon; Bruce G Ferguson; Luis García Barrios; Raúl García Barrios; Daniel Jaffee; Jefferson Lima; V Ernesto Méndez; Helda Morales; Lorena Soto-Pinto; John Vandermeer; Ivette Perfecto
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-11-06

10.  Insights into nitrogen allocation and recycling from nitrogen elemental analysis and 15N isotope labelling in 14 genotypes of willow.

Authors:  Nicholas J B Brereton; Frederic E Pitre; Ian Shield; Steven J Hanley; Michael J Ray; Richard J Murphy; Angela Karp
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.