Literature DB >> 1853551

A comparison of three techniques for closure of pelvic flexure enterotomies in normal equine colon.

R L Young1, J R Snyder, J R Pascoe, H J Olander, D M Hinds.   

Abstract

Six enterotomies 3 cm long, spaced at 3 cm intervals, were made in the antimesenteric border of the pelvic flexure of the ascending colon in five adult horses. Ten incisions each were sutured with a Utrecht pattern (single layer), a full-thickness simple continuous oversewn with a Cushing pattern (two layer), and a mucosal simple continuous with a seromuscular simple continuous oversewn with a Cushing pattern (three layer). In all horses, chromic gut and polyglactin 910 were each used once for each pattern. On day 6, the pelvic flexure was excised and the colonic vessels were injected with a radio-opaque mass. Sections of each enterotomy were studied by light microscopy and high detail radiography. The single-layer closure led to serosa-to-mucosa healing and a thin bowel wall, and the three-layer closure resulted in distortion of the bowel wall by hematoma formation and submucosal contamination with ingesta. The two-layer closure resulted in good alignment and improved healing. There was less inflammatory reaction with polyglactin 910 than with chromic gut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1853551     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1991.tb00333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of single layer staple closure versus double layer hand-sewn closure for equine pelvic flexure enterotomy.

Authors:  Julie M Rosser; Sabrina Brounts; Michael Livesey; Kerri Wiedmeyer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Pelvic flexure enterotomy closure in the horse with a TA-90 stapling device: a retrospective clinical study of 84 cases (2001-2008).

Authors:  Julie Rosser; Sabrina Brounts; Don Slone; Tim Lynch; Michael Livesey; Faith Hughes; Carol Clark
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.008

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.