Literature DB >> 18535324

Measuring psychological insulin resistance: barriers to insulin use.

Mary E Larkin1, Virginia A Capasso1, Chien-Lin Chen1, Ellen K Mahoney2, Barbara Hazard2, Enrico Cagliero1, David M Nathan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to explore the attitudes that contribute to psychological insulin resistance (PIR) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes and to identify predictors of PIR.
METHODS: A prospective study using 2 self-report surveys and incorporating demographic and health variables was conducted to determine the prevalence of PIR among a sample of 100 adult, insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes at an outpatient diabetes center in a university-affiliated teaching hospital.
RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of patients with type 2 diabetes were unwilling to take insulin. The most commonly expressed negative attitudes were concern regarding hypoglycemia, permanent need for insulin therapy, less flexibility, and feelings of failure. Less than 40% expressed fear of self-injection or thought that injections were painful. However, compared with willing subjects, unwilling subjects were more likely to fear injections and thought injections would be painful, life would be less flexible, and taking insulin meant health would deteriorate (P< .005 for all comparisons). Poorer general health and higher depression scores also correlated with PIR.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the surveys, which were generally consistent, identified several remediable misconceptions regarding insulin therapy and suggest targets for educational interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18535324     DOI: 10.1177/0145721708317869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Educ        ISSN: 0145-7217            Impact factor:   2.140


  48 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Psychological Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes: a Critical Comparison of Measures.

Authors:  E Holmes-Truscott; F Pouwer; J Speight
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Development and initial validation of the barriers to diabetes adherence measure for adolescents.

Authors:  Shelagh A Mulvaney; Korey K Hood; David G Schlundt; Chandra Y Osborn; Kevin B Johnson; Russell L Rothman; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Diabetes oral medication initiation and intensification: patient views compared with current treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Lina Pabon-Nau; Kaile M Ross; Emily J Youatt; Jennifer C Pandiscio; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 2.140

4.  Delivery of intracavernosal therapies using needle-free injection devices.

Authors:  D O'Kane; L Gibson; J du Plessis; A Davidson; D Bolton; N Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  The meaning of insulin to Hispanic immigrants with type 2 diabetes and their families.

Authors:  Jie Hu; Karen A Amirehsani; Debra C Wallace; Susan Letvak
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.140

6.  Psychological insulin resistance among low-income, U.S. racial minority patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Suman Machinani; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Stanley H Hsia
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project.

Authors:  Andrew J Karter; Usha Subramanian; Chandan Saha; Jesse C Crosson; Melissa M Parker; Bix E Swain; Howard H Moffet; David G Marrero
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Perspectives and experiences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatments for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bernard Gauthier; Sumeet R Singh; Adil Virani; Heidi Staples; Ann Colbourne
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.

Authors:  Lill-Brith von Arx; Trine Kjeer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Facilitators and barriers to successful recruitment into a large comparative effectiveness trial: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stephanie Behringer-Massera; Terysia Browne; Geny George; Sally Duran; Andrea Cherrington; M Diane McKee
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.