Literature DB >> 18535312

Designing the process evaluation for the collaborative planning of a local turning point partnership.

Eleni L Tolma1, Marshall K Cheney, Pam Troup, Neil Hann.   

Abstract

This study describes the design of the process evaluation of a collaborative effort among community partners to address health issues in central Oklahoma. The design is an application of a sound process evaluation planning framework that integrates the components of context, reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, implementation, recruitment, barriers, and maintenance. The planning framework also provides guidance regarding the steps of designing and implementing the process evaluation. This planning process was conducted by utilizing a participatory research approach. At the end of the planning phase, the evaluation team accomplished the following: (a) development of an evaluation plan, (b) development of evaluation instruments (i.e., surveys, interview guides, observation forms), and (c) development of evaluation questions and process objectives. The information derived from this study can be valuable to practitioners and researchers involved in the planning of community partnerships or coalitions and interested in process evaluation that takes place in community settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18535312     DOI: 10.1177/1524839907311574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  3 in total

1.  Comparing the Functioning of Youth and Adult Partnerships for Health Promotion.

Authors:  Louis D Brown; Alisha H Redelfs; Thomas J Taylor; Reanna L Messer
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2015-09

2.  A standardized reporting system for assessment of diverse public health programs.

Authors:  Douglas Fernald; Abigail Harris; Elizabeth Ann Deaton; Vicki Weister; Shannon Pray; Carsten Baumann; Arnold Levinson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Salla Atkins; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.