BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data monitoring trends in stroke risk among different ethnic groups are lacking. Thus, we investigated trends in stroke incidence and modifiable stroke risk factors over a 10-year time period between different ethnic groups. METHODS: Changes in stroke incidence were investigated with the South London Stroke Register (SLSR). The SLSR is a population-based stroke register, covering a multiethnic population of 271 817 inhabitants in South London with 63% white, 28% black, and 9% of other ethnic group (2001 Census). RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2004, 2874 patients with first-ever stroke of all age groups were included. Total stroke incidence decreased over the 10-year study period in men (incidence rate ratio 1995 to 1996 versus 2003 to 2004 [IRR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97) and in women (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.90). A similar decline in total stroke incidence could be observed in whites for men and women (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.93 versus IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.89, respectively); in blacks, total stroke incidence was reducing only in women (IRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.75). In whites, the prevalence of prior-to-stroke hypertension (P=0.0017), atrial fibrillation (P=0.0113), and smoking (P=0.0177) decreased; no statistically significant changes in prior-to-stroke risk factors were observed in blacks. Total stroke incidence was higher in blacks compared to whites (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.46 in men; IRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.50 in women), but the black-white gap reduced during the 10-year time period (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.82 in 1995 to 1996 to 1.18, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.49 in 2003 to 2004). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke incidence decreased over a 10-year time period. The greatest decline in incidence was observed in black women, but ethnic group disparities still exist, indicating a higher stroke risk in black people compared to white people. Advances in risk factor reduction observed in the white population were failed transferring to the black population.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data monitoring trends in stroke risk among different ethnic groups are lacking. Thus, we investigated trends in stroke incidence and modifiable stroke risk factors over a 10-year time period between different ethnic groups. METHODS: Changes in stroke incidence were investigated with the South London Stroke Register (SLSR). The SLSR is a population-based stroke register, covering a multiethnic population of 271 817 inhabitants in South London with 63% white, 28% black, and 9% of other ethnic group (2001 Census). RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2004, 2874 patients with first-ever stroke of all age groups were included. Total stroke incidence decreased over the 10-year study period in men (incidence rate ratio 1995 to 1996 versus 2003 to 2004 [IRR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97) and in women (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.90). A similar decline in total stroke incidence could be observed in whites for men and women (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.93 versus IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.89, respectively); in blacks, total stroke incidence was reducing only in women (IRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.75). In whites, the prevalence of prior-to-stroke hypertension (P=0.0017), atrial fibrillation (P=0.0113), and smoking (P=0.0177) decreased; no statistically significant changes in prior-to-stroke risk factors were observed in blacks. Total stroke incidence was higher in blacks compared to whites (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.46 in men; IRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.50 in women), but the black-white gap reduced during the 10-year time period (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.82 in 1995 to 1996 to 1.18, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.49 in 2003 to 2004). CONCLUSIONS:Stroke incidence decreased over a 10-year time period. The greatest decline in incidence was observed in black women, but ethnic group disparities still exist, indicating a higher stroke risk in black people compared to white people. Advances in risk factor reduction observed in the white population were failed transferring to the black population.
Authors: Ugo Fedeli; Mara Pigato; Francesco Avossa; Eliana Ferroni; Lucia Nardetto; Bruno Giometto; Mario Saugo Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Jennifer R Davis; Sacoby Wilson; Amy Brock-Martin; Saundra Glover; Erik R Svendsen Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Brooks D Lindsey; Heather A Nicoletto; Ellen R Bennett; Daniel T Laskowitz; Stephen W Smith Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Philippe Bijlenga; Akio Morita; Nerissa U Ko; J Mocco; Sandrine Morel; Yuichi Murayama; Marieke J H Wermer; Robert D Brown Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Valery L Feigin; Bo Norrving; Mary G George; Jennifer L Foltz; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Lewis B Morgenstern; Melinda A Smith; Brisa N Sánchez; Devin L Brown; Darin B Zahuranec; Nelda Garcia; Kevin A Kerber; Lesli E Skolarus; William J Meurer; James F Burke; Eric E Adelman; Jonggyu Baek; Lynda D Lisabeth Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Darin B Zahuranec; Lynda D Lisabeth; Brisa N Sánchez; Melinda A Smith; Devin L Brown; Nelda M Garcia; Lesli E Skolarus; William J Meurer; James F Burke; Eric E Adelman; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Raffaella Colombatti; Giorgio Meneghetti; Mario Ermani; Marta Pierobon; Laura Sainati Journal: Ital J Pediatr Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 2.638