Literature DB >> 18534602

Biomechanical modelling of normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Tonmoy Dutta-Roy1, Adam Wittek, Karol Miller.   

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanics of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) growth using a computational approach. We created a generic 3-D brain mesh of a healthy human brain and modelled the brain parenchyma as single phase and biphasic continuum. In our model, hyperelastic constitutive law and finite deformation theory described deformations within the brain parenchyma. We used a value of 155.77Pa for the shear modulus (mu) of the brain parenchyma. Additionally, in our model, contact boundary definitions constrained the brain outer surface inside the skull. We used transmantle pressure difference to load the model. Fully nonlinear, implicit finite element procedures in the time domain were used to obtain the deformations of the ventricles and the brain. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first 3-D, fully nonlinear model investigating NPH growth mechanics. Clinicians generally accept that at most 1mm of Hg transmantle pressure difference (133.416Pa) is associated with the condition of NPH. Our computations showed that transmantle pressure difference of 1mm of Hg (133.416Pa) did not produce NPH for either single phase or biphasic model of the brain parenchyma. A minimum transmantle pressure difference of 1.764mm of Hg (235.44Pa) was required to produce the clinical condition of NPH. This suggested that the hypothesis of a purely mechanical basis for NPH growth needs to be revised. We also showed that under equal transmantle pressure difference load, there were no significant differences between the computed ventricular volumes for biphasic and incompressible/nearly incompressible single phase model of the brain parenchyma. As a result, there was no major advantage gained by using a biphasic model for the brain parenchyma. We propose that for modelling NPH, nearly incompressible single phase model of the brain parenchyma was adequate. Single phase treatment of the brain parenchyma simplified the mathematical description of the NPH model and resulted in significant reduction of computational time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534602     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  A MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ROLE OF INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE PULSATIONS AND SMALL GRADIENTS IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF HYDROCEPHALUS.

Authors:  Kathleen P Wilkie; Corina S Drapaca; Sivabal Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Int J Numer Anal Model B       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Biomechanical modeling and computer simulation of the brain during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Karol Miller; Grand R Joldes; George Bourantas; Simon K Warfield; Damon E Hyde; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 3.  Transmantle and transvenous pressure gradients in cerebrospinal fluid disorders.

Authors:  Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Exploring the efficacy of endoscopic ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus treatment via a multicompartmental poroelastic model of CSF transport: a computational perspective.

Authors:  John C Vardakis; Brett J Tully; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatial model of convective solute transport in brain extracellular space does not support a "glymphatic" mechanism.

Authors:  Byung-Ju Jin; Alex J Smith; Alan S Verkman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  FSI simulation of CSF hydrodynamic changes in a large population of non-communicating hydrocephalus patients during treatment process with regard to their clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Seifollah Gholampour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating tensile damage of brain tissue in intracerebral hemorrhage based on strain energy.

Authors:  Peng Ren; Bo-Chu Wang; Ya-Zhou Wang; Shi-Lei Hao; Ting-Wang Guo; Xiao-Fei Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients.

Authors:  Seifollah Gholampour; Nasser Fatouraee
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  A New Definition for Intracranial Compliance to Evaluate Adult Hydrocephalus After Shunting.

Authors:  Seifollah Gholampour; Bakhtiar Yamini; Julie Droessler; David Frim
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-01

10.  Can pulsatile CSF flow across the cerebral aqueduct cause ventriculomegaly? A prospective study of patients with communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  P Holmlund; S Qvarlander; J Malm; A Eklund
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2019-12-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.