Literature DB >> 18534586

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD by application of multiple Plicator implants: a multicenter study (with video).

Daniel von Renteln1, Ingolf Schiefke, Karl-Hermann Fuchs, Susanne Raczynski, Michael Philipper, Wolfram Breithaupt, Karel Caca, Horst Neuhaus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The full-thickness Plicator allows transmural suturing at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction to restructure the antireflux barrier. Studies of the Plicator procedure to date have been limited to placement of a single transmural suture to create the endoscopic gastroplication.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of placing multiple transmural sutures for the treatment of GERD.
DESIGN: Open-label, prospective, multicenter study.
SETTING: Four tertiary-referral centers. PATIENTS: Subjects with symptomatic GERD who require daily maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Study exclusions were hiatal hernia >3 cm, grades III and IV esophagitis, Barrett's epithelium, and esophageal dysmotility.
INTERVENTIONS: Forty-one patients received two or more transmural sutures placed linearly in the anterior gastric cardia approximately 1 cm below the GE junction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Six months after the procedure, median GERD-health-related quality of life (HRQL) improved 76% compared with off-medication baseline (6.0 vs 25.0, P < .001), with 75% of patients (32/40) achieving >50% improvement in their baseline GERD-HRQL score. Six months after the procedure, daily PPI therapy was eliminated in 70% of patients (28/40). Heartburn symptoms improved 80% compared with off-medication baseline (16.0 vs 84.0, P < .001). Median esophagitis grade improved 75% compared with baseline (0.0 vs 1.0, P = .005). Esophageal pH assessed as median distal esophageal-acid exposure (percentage time pH < 4.0) improved 38% compared with baseline (9.0 vs 11.0, P < .020; nominal P value for a single statistical test: significance removed upon the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing of data) and manometric outcomes were also improved compared with baseline (median lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure improved 25% [10.0 vs 6.0, P < .017; nominal P value for a single statistical test: significance removed upon the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing of data]) and median amplitude of contraction improved 11% (70.0 vs 62.0, P < .037; nominal P value for a single statistical test: significance removed upon the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing of data). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. No randomized comparison with a single implant group.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic full-thickness plication with multiple serially placed implants was safe and effective in reducing GERD symptoms, medication use, esophageal-acid exposure, and esophagitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534586     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  8 in total

1.  Update on Endoscopic Approaches for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2019-07

2.  Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease using multiple Plicator implants: 12-month multicenter study results.

Authors:  D von Renteln; I Schiefke; K H Fuchs; S Raczynski; M Philipper; W Breithaupt; K Caca; H Neuhaus
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Do endoscopic antireflux procedures fit in the current treatment paradigm of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Kumar Krishnan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Evaluating outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness plication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with impedance monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Arthur Schmidt; Bettina Riecken; Karel Caca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Electrical stimulation therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Nicolaas F Rinsma; Nicole D Bouvy; Ad A M Masclee; José M Conchillo
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 6.  Endoscopic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Revisited.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 7.  The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Shiko Kuribayashi; Hiroko Hosaka; Fumihiko Nakamura; Ko Nakata; Keigo Sato; Yuki Itoi; Yu Hashimoto; Kengo Kasuga; Hirohito Tanaka; Toshio Uraoka
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-12-30

8.  Endoscopic treatment of refractory gastroesohageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Won Hee Kim; Pil Won Park; Ki Baik Hahm; Sung Pyo Hong
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.