Literature DB >> 18534532

Implant design and resection length affect cemented endoprosthesis survival in proximal tibial reconstruction.

Chia-Chun Wu1, Robert M Henshaw, Tamir Pritsch, Malcolm H Squires, Martin M Malawer.   

Abstract

Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal tibia continues to pose many challenges. A retrospective analysis of 44 consecutive patients who underwent cemented proximal tibial replacement were included to investigate if patient age, surgical stage, type of implant, stem diameter, or resection length could be associated with implant failure. Fifteen patients (34%) suffered prosthetic failure, 7 due to infection. Prosthetic-related complications occurred in 13 patients (30%). Custom design prosthesis and longer length of resection were significantly associated with prosthesis survival in a Cox regression analysis (P = .001, hazard ratio = 8.747 and P = .044, hazard ratio = 1.217, respectively). Cemented proximal tibial replacement offers a functional knee, but reducing risk of complications still remains challenging. Prosthetic design and length of resection affect overall cemented endoprosthesis survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534532     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Late complications and survival of endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of bone tumors.

Authors:  Ahmad Shehadeh; Jenna Noveau; Martin Malawer; Robert Henshaw
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee.

Authors:  Chunlin Zhang; Jianping Hu; Kunpeng Zhu; Tao Cai; Xiaolong Ma
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Proximal tibial replacement and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after bone tumor resection].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; H Pilge; A Toepfer; R G Jakubietz; H Gollwitzer; H Rechl; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; M Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Proximal tibia osteoarticular allografts in tumor limb salvage surgery.

Authors:  D Luis Muscolo; Miguel A Ayerza; German Farfalli; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases in proximal tibia: a multicenter case series of 74 patients.

Authors:  Kaarel Kilk; Jessica Ehne; Jonathan D Stevenson; Gilber Kask; Jyrki Nieminen; Rikard Wedin; Michael C Parry; Minna K Laitinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for aseptic loosening after tumor prosthetic replacement around the knee: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Hao-Ran Zhang; Feng Wang; Xiong-Gang Yang; Ming-You Xu; Rui-Qi Qiao; Ji-Kai Li; Yun-Long Zhao; Cheng-Gang Pang; Xiu-Chun Yu; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal tibia: how long do they last?

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.