Literature DB >> 18533782

Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations: 1-year prospective study.

Eugenio Romeo1, Diego Lops, Alessandro Rossi, Stefano Storelli, Roberto Rozza, Matteo Chiapasco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gingival esthetics around dental implants have become a main focus for clinicians. This study analyzed the surgical, prosthetic, and anatomic factors involved in the management of peri-implant tissues.
METHODS: Forty-eight subjects with one tooth scheduled for tooth extraction and immediate implant placement were included in the study. After healing, the implants were restored with single-crown fixed prostheses. The following parameters were assessed after 12 months: presence/absence of the interproximal papilla, interimplant-tooth distance (ITD), distance from the base of the contact point to the interdental bone (CPB), and soft tissue biotype. ITD and CPB values were derived from computer analysis of periapical radiographs. A statistical analysis determined the effect of ITD and CPB on the presence of the interproximal papilla.
RESULTS: Papilla was significantly present (P <0.05) for ITD of 2.5 to 4 mm in anterior and posterior areas and for CPB < or =7 mm in posterior areas. Thick biotype was significantly associated (P <0.05) with the presence of the papilla.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of surgical and prosthetic plans represents the key factor to optimize predictability in single-implant esthetics. The recommended interproximal distance between the implant and the adjacent tooth is 2.5 to 4 mm. The distance from the contact point to the interdental bone is recommended to be <7 mm. Papilla presence is also correlated with a thick gingival biotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18533782     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  8 in total

1.  Papillae alterations around single-implant restorations in the anterior maxillae: thick versus thin mucosa.

Authors:  Mi-Si Si; Long-Fei Zhuang; Xin Huang; Ying-Xin Gu; Chung-Hao Chou; Hong-Chang Lai
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.344

2.  Association of gingival biotype with the results of scaling and root planing.

Authors:  Yeon-Woo Sin; Hee-Yung Chang; Woo-Hyuk Yun; Seong-Nyum Jeong; Sung-Hee Pi; Hyung-Keun You
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Correlation of gingival thickness with gingival width, probing depth, and papillary fill in maxillary anterior teeth in students of a dental college in Navi Mumbai.

Authors:  Jyotsna Singh; Varsha J Rathod; Prajakta R Rao; Aardra A Patil; Deepak G Langade; Roshan K Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  Gingival thickness threshold and probe visibility through soft tissue: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kloukos; Eleni Kalimeri; George Koukos; Alexandra Stähli; Anton Sculean; Christos Katsaros
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 5.  The influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant soft tissues on aesthetic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Miha Pirc; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ronald E Jung; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

6.  Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Kathrin Becker; Stefan P Bienz; Christer Dahlin; Nikos Donos; Christian Hammächer; Gerhard Iglhaut; Antonio Liñares; Alberto Ortiz-Vigón; Nerea Sanchez; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Daniel S Thoma; Cristina Valles; Dietmar Weng; José Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

7.  Interproximal Papillae Reconstruction around Implant Using Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Maxillary Anterior Region: A Case Series.

Authors:  Satish Gupta; Vikas Deo; Cecil Williams
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-07-01

8.  Prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic treatment of infraversion and open bite.

Authors:  Juan-Juan Ji; Xu-Dong Li; Qun Fan; Xiao-Jun Liu; Shuang Yao; Zhi Zhou; Shuang Yang; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.341

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.