Literature DB >> 18533328

Sleepiness and performance in response to repeated sleep restriction and subsequent recovery during semi-laboratory conditions.

John Axelsson1, Göran Kecklund, Torbjörn Akerstedt, Paolo Donofrio, Mats Lekander, Michael Ingre.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate of how best to measure the effects of sleep loss in a reliable and feasible way, partly because well controlled laboratory studies and field studies have come to different conclusions. The aims of the present study were to investigate both sleepiness and performance in response to long-term sleep restriction and recovery in a semi-laboratory environment, investigate order effects (i.e., whether levels return to baseline) in a study with seven days of recovery, and characterize individual differences in tolerance to restricted sleep. Nine healthy men (age 23-28 yrs) participated in the protocol, which included one habituation day (sleep 23:00-07:00 h), two baseline days (23:00-07:00 h), five days with restricted sleep (03:00-07:00 h), and seven recovery days (23:00-07:00 h). Participants went outdoors at least twice each day. Reaction-time tests were performed at 08:00, 14:00, and 20:00 h each day in the laboratory. Sleepiness was self-rated by the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)after each test. The mixed-effect regression models showed that each day of restricted sleep resulted in an increase of sleepiness by 0.64+/- .05 KSS units (a nine-step scale, p < .001), increase of median reaction times of 6.6+/- 1.6 ms ( p = .003), and increase of lapses/test of 0.69 +/- .16 ms ( p < .001). Seven days of recovery allowed participants to return to the baseline for sleepiness and median reaction time, but not for lapses. The individual differences were larger for performance measures than for sleepiness; the between-subject standard deviation for the random intercept was in the magnitude of the effects of 1.1 days of restricted sleep for sleepiness, 6.6 days of restricted sleep for median reaction time, and 3.2 days for lapses. In conclusion, the present study shows that sleepiness is closely related to sleep pressure, while performance measures, to a larger extent, appear determined by specific individual traits. Moreover, it is suggested to measure sleepiness in a standardized situation so as to minimize the influences of contextual factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18533328     DOI: 10.1080/07420520802107031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  26 in total

1.  Adaptation rate of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin and cognitive performance in offshore fleet shift workers: a field study.

Authors:  Jakob H Hansen; Ingunn H Geving; Randi E Reinertsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Sleep Loss and Fatigue in Shift Work and Shift Work Disorder.

Authors:  Torbjörn Akerstedt; Kenneth P Wright
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2009-06-01

Review 3.  Sleep and athletic performance: the effects of sleep loss on exercise performance, and physiological and cognitive responses to exercise.

Authors:  Hugh H K Fullagar; Sabrina Skorski; Rob Duffield; Daniel Hammes; Aaron J Coutts; Tim Meyer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effect of sleep efficiency on salivary metabolite profile and cognitive function during exercise in volleyball athletes.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Akazawa; Naoko Kobayashi; Yuki Nakamura; Hiroshi Kumagai; Youngju Choi; Seiji Maeda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Residual, differential neurobehavioral deficits linger after multiple recovery nights following chronic sleep restriction or acute total sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Erika M Yamazaki; Caroline A Antler; Charlotte R Lasek; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  The efficacy of a restart break for recycling with optimal performance depends critically on circadian timing.

Authors:  Hans P A Van Dongen; Gregory Belenky; Bryan J Vila
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 7.  Neurobehavioral Effects and Biomarkers of Sleep Loss in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Namni Goel
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Neurobehavioral dynamics following chronic sleep restriction: dose-response effects of one night for recovery.

Authors:  Siobhan Banks; Hans P A Van Dongen; Greg Maislin; David F Dinges
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Effects of modafinil on the sleep EEG depend on Val158Met genotype of COMT.

Authors:  Sereina Bodenmann; Hans-Peter Landolt
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Modeling Neurocognitive Decline and Recovery During Repeated Cycles of Extended Sleep and Chronic Sleep Deficiency.

Authors:  Melissa A St Hilaire; Melanie Rüger; Federico Fratelli; Joseph T Hull; Andrew J K Phillips; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.