Literature DB >> 18533154

Randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology: overview of parameters and pitfalls.

Panayotis N Soucacos1, Elizabeth O Johnson, George Babis.   

Abstract

There is a growing consensus that randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) provide a secure basis for determining treatment effects. Prospective randomised clinical trials can be a powerful tool in medical science and evidence-based medicine. A well-defined study hypothesis, with a prospectively applied study design, blinded and randomised treatment allocation and assessment, with appropriate control groups can provide strong evidence in support of treatment decisions. However, the recent reviews of the medical literature indicate that the study design itself does not ensure the quality of science or useful and valid scientific data. Thus, regardless of the study design or level of evidence, it remains imperative for the physician and surgeon to critically evaluate a scientific report. Moreover, as randomisation, concealment of treatment allocation and blinding are difficult issues to resolve in orthopaedic surgery, future trials should focus on detailed and correct reporting of outcome measures.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18533154     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Statistics in Brief: Instrumental Variable Analysis: An Underutilized Method in Orthopaedic Research.

Authors:  Hsin-Hui Huang; Paul J Cagle; Madhu Mazumdar; Jashvant Poeran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Are large fracture trials really possible? What we have learned from the randomized controlled damage control study?

Authors:  Eva Steinhausen; Bertil Bouillon; Dieter Rixen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  An evaluation of the quality of statistical design and analysis of published medical research: results from a systematic survey of general orthopaedic journals.

Authors:  Nick R Parsons; Charlotte L Price; Richard Hiskens; Juul Achten; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Plantar fasciitis - to jab or to support? A systematic review of the current best evidence.

Authors:  Hayley Uden; Eva Boesch; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-05-24

5.  What are the health consequences associated with differences in medical malpractice liability laws? An instrumental variable analysis of surgery effects on health outcomes for proximal humeral facture across states with different liability rules.

Authors:  Brian Chen; Sarah Floyd; Dakshu Jindal; Cole Chapman; John Brooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review from 1970-2009.

Authors:  Alexander Tepass; Bernd Rolauffs; Kuno Weise; Sonja D Bahrs; Klaus Dietz; Christian Bahrs
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-11-24

7.  Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Loes W A H van Beers; Jakob van Oldenrijk; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Carel H Geerdink; Bob B A M Niers; Wouter Runne; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN ORTHOPEDICS: DIFFICULTIES AND LIMITATIONS.

Authors:  Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Marco Kawamura Demange; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Marta Imamura; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.