OBJECTIVE: We compared the metabolic and cardiovascular parameters of a reference group of women with those of women who used 2 contraceptive regimes that are used worldwide: the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and oral contraceptives. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated a cohort of 2814 women at age 31 years from the general population-based Northern Finland Birth Cohort who were born in 1966. Women were classified as oral contraceptive users (n = 687 women), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users (n = 168 women), or no use of hormonal contraception (reference group; n = 1959 women). The analyses were adjusted for body mass index, current alcohol use, household income, and area of residence. RESULTS: Compared with the reference group, oral contraceptive users had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, raised levels of inflammatory indices (C-reactive protein), and impaired insulin sensitivity. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users displayed a lower high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, but a similar cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein ratio, and higher leukocyte count compared with the reference group. Oral contraception users were insulin-resistant compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users with higher blood pressure, raised lipid levels (such as total cholesterol and triglycerides) and insulin levels, and lower homeostasis model assessment and insulin sensitivity, despite smaller waist and lower waist-hip ratio. CONCLUSION: Oral contraception usage was associated with adverse findings in several metabolic, cardiovascular, and inflammatory parameters, which is consistent with an increased future risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease. These findings should invite more criticism of recent trends that encourage the prescription of oral contraceptives for years during reproductive life and especially in premenopausal women. In contrast, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device or progestin-only pills may offer long-term health benefits over oral contraceptives and should be preferred to oral contraceptives for women in their forties and/or with metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the metabolic and cardiovascular parameters of a reference group of women with those of women who used 2 contraceptive regimes that are used worldwide: the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and oral contraceptives. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated a cohort of 2814 women at age 31 years from the general population-based Northern Finland Birth Cohort who were born in 1966. Women were classified as oral contraceptive users (n = 687 women), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users (n = 168 women), or no use of hormonal contraception (reference group; n = 1959 women). The analyses were adjusted for body mass index, current alcohol use, household income, and area of residence. RESULTS: Compared with the reference group, oral contraceptive users had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, raised levels of inflammatory indices (C-reactive protein), and impaired insulin sensitivity. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users displayed a lower high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, but a similar cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein ratio, and higher leukocyte count compared with the reference group. Oral contraception users were insulin-resistant compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users with higher blood pressure, raised lipid levels (such as total cholesterol and triglycerides) and insulin levels, and lower homeostasis model assessment and insulin sensitivity, despite smaller waist and lower waist-hip ratio. CONCLUSION: Oral contraception usage was associated with adverse findings in several metabolic, cardiovascular, and inflammatory parameters, which is consistent with an increased future risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease. These findings should invite more criticism of recent trends that encourage the prescription of oral contraceptives for years during reproductive life and especially in premenopausal women. In contrast, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device or progestin-only pills may offer long-term health benefits over oral contraceptives and should be preferred to oral contraceptives for women in their forties and/or with metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Authors: Jyoti S Mathad; Nikhil Gupte; Ashwin Balagopal; David Asmuth; James Hakim; Breno Santos; Cynthia Riviere; Mina Hosseinipour; Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa; Rosa Infante; Sandy Pillay; Sandra W Cardoso; Noluthando Mwelase; Jyoti Pawar; Sima Berendes; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Bruno B Andrade; Thomas B Campbell; Judith S Currier; Susan E Cohn; Amita Gupta Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Chiara Sabatti; Susan K Service; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Anneli Pouta; Samuli Ripatti; Jae Brodsky; Chris G Jones; Noah A Zaitlen; Teppo Varilo; Marika Kaakinen; Ulla Sovio; Aimo Ruokonen; Jaana Laitinen; Eveliina Jakkula; Lachlan Coin; Clive Hoggart; Andrew Collins; Hannu Turunen; Stacey Gabriel; Paul Elliot; Mark I McCarthy; Mark J Daly; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Nelson B Freimer; Leena Peltonen Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-12-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Qin Wang; Peter Würtz; Kirsi Auro; Laure Morin-Papunen; Antti J Kangas; Pasi Soininen; Mika Tiainen; Tuulia Tynkkynen; Anni Joensuu; Aki S Havulinna; Kristiina Aalto; Marko Salmi; Stefan Blankenberg; Tanja Zeller; Jorma Viikari; Mika Kähönen; Terho Lehtimäki; Veikko Salomaa; Sirpa Jalkanen; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Markus Perola; Olli T Raitakari; Debbie A Lawlor; Johannes Kettunen; Mika Ala-Korpela Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Cecilie J Sørensen; Ole B Pedersen; Mikkel S Petersen; Erik Sørensen; Sebastian Kotzé; Lise W Thørner; Henrik Hjalgrim; Andreas S Rigas; Bjarne Møller; Klaus Rostgaard; Mads Riiskjær; Henrik Ullum; Christian Erikstrup Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dylan M Williams; Saranya Palaniswamy; Sylvain Sebert; Jessica L Buxton; Alexandra I F Blakemore; Elina Hyppönen; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Anderson Sanches de Melo; Rosana Maria Dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Carolina Sales Vieira Journal: Open Access J Contracept Date: 2017-02-02