Literature DB >> 1853218

Computed tomography measurements of the acetabulum in adult dysplastic hips: which level is appropriate?

S Anda1, T Terjesen, K A Kvistad.   

Abstract

A study has been performed to evaluate whether one or several levels are needed with computed tomography (CT) study to provide sufficient information regarding anteversion and acetabular support to the femoral head. A total of 23 hips in 14 adults with uni- or bilateral congenital hip dysplasia (center-edge angle less than 20 degrees) were assessed by obtaining 5-mm contiguous CT slices and performing acetabular measurements at four levels. Both anterior and posterior acetabular supports as quantified by the anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles were significantly lower than normal at all levels. The sector angles increased in the proximal cuts, whereas the acetabular anteversion increased caudally. Because no important additional information was gained by measuring at different levels, we conclude that CT study at one level is sufficient for acetabular measurements and suggest that the slice through the center of the femoral head is the most appropriate one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1853218     DOI: 10.1007/bf02341662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  21 in total

1.  Three-dimensional CT and MR imaging in congenital dislocation of the hip: clinical and technical considerations.

Authors:  P Lang; P Steiger; H K Genant; N Chafetz; T Lindquist; S Skinner; S Moore
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Acetabular cover in congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  S Ogata; H Moriya; K Tsuchiya; T Akita; M Kamegaya; M Someya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

3.  Preoperative roentgenographic evaluation for osteotomies about the hip in children.

Authors:  G T Rab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Mechanics of the normal and osteoarthritic hip. A new perspective.

Authors:  R Bombelli; R F Santore; R Poss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Innominate osteotomy in the management of residual congenital subluxation of the hip in young adults.

Authors:  R B Salter; G Hansson; G H Thompson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Normal axial anatomy of the hip as demonstrated by computed tomography.

Authors:  B Dubowitz; E Barmeir; M Stein; M Roffman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Influence of femoral rotation on the radiological coverage of the femoral head in children.

Authors:  J Reimers; V Bialik
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1981

8.  Containment of the hip: a theoretical comparison of osteotomies.

Authors:  G T Rab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation.

Authors:  S Anda; T Terjesen; K A Kvistad; S Svenningsen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  The use of computerised tomography in dislocation of the hip and femoral neck anteversion in children.

Authors:  H A Peterson; R A Klassen; R A McLeod; A D Hoffman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981-08
View more
  28 in total

1.  Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Saif Ul Islam; Richard Tippett; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Johan D Witt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Evaluation of a computerized measurement technique for joint alignment before and during periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Robert S Armiger; Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepisto; Davneet Minhas; Kaj Tallroth; Simon C Mears; Matthew D Waites; Russell H Taylor
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2007-07

3.  Is the acetabulum retroverted in slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Venkatadass Krishnamoorthy; Bernd Bittersohl; James D Bomar; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction.

Authors:  Eric S Stem; Mary I O'Connor; Mark J Kransdorf; Julia Crook
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  How do acetabular version and femoral head coverage change with skeletal maturity?

Authors:  Andreas M Hingsammer; Sarah Bixby; David Zurakowski; Yi-Meng Yen; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparison of acetabular version angle measurements between prone and reformatted supine computed tomography images.

Authors:  Le Roy Chong; Chow Wei Too
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Acetabular orientation variability and symmetry based on CT scans of adults.

Authors:  Omri Lubovsky; Eran Peleg; Leo Joskowicz; Meir Liebergall; Amal Khoury
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Acetabular Retroversion and Decreased Posterior Coverage Are Associated With Sports-related Posterior Hip Dislocation in Adolescents.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Mariana G Ferrer; Kathryn A Williams; Sarah D Bixby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Interobserver repeatability of measurements on computed tomography images of lax canine hip joints from youth to maturity.

Authors:  Mandi J Lopez; Kechia M Davis; Susan L Jeffrey-Borger; Mark D Markel; Christy Rettenmund
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.495

10.  Cranial acetabular retroversion is common in developmental dysplasia of the hip as assessed by the weight bearing position.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Lone Rømer; Steffen Jacobsen; Steen Ladelund; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.