Literature DB >> 18528857

Can suture repair of ACL transection restore normal anteroposterior laxity of the knee? An ex vivo study.

Braden C Fleming1, James L Carey, Kurt P Spindler, Martha M Murray.   

Abstract

Recent work has suggested the transected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can heal and support reasonable loads if repaired with sutures and a bioactive scaffold; however, use of a traditional suture configuration results in knees with increased anterior-posterior (AP) laxity. The objective was to determine whether one of five different suture repair constructs when performed at two different joint positions would restore normal AP knee laxity. AP laxity of the porcine knee at 60 degrees of flexion was evaluated for five suture repair techniques. Femoral fixation for all repair techniques utilized a suture anchor. Primary repair was to either the tibial stump, one of three bony locations in the ACL footprint, or a hybrid bony fixation. All five repairs were tied with the knee in first 30 degrees and then 60 degrees of flexion for a total of 10 repair constructs. Suture repair to bony fixation points within the anterior half of the normal ACL footprint resulted in knee laxity values within 0.5 mm of the ACL-intact joint when the sutures were tied with the knee at 60 degrees flexion. Suture repair to the tibial stump, or with the knee at 30 degrees of flexion, did not restore normal AP laxity of the knee. Three specific suture repair techniques for the transected porcine ACL restored the normal AP laxity of the knee at the time of surgery. Additional studies defining the changes in laxity with cyclic loading and in vivo healing are indicated. (c) 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18528857      PMCID: PMC2790602          DOI: 10.1002/jor.20690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  27 in total

1.  The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  E S Grood; K A Walz-Hasselfeld; J P Holden; F R Noyes; M S Levy; D L Butler; D W Jackson; D J Drez
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Method for setting total graft force and load sharing in augmented ACL grafts.

Authors:  W D Lew; L Engebretsen; J L Lewis; R E Hunter; C Kowalczyk
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The measurement of anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo.

Authors:  B Beynnon; J G Howe; M H Pope; R J Johnson; B C Fleming
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J A Feagin; W W Curl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  J L Marshall; R F Warren; T L Wickiewicz; B Reider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Maintenance of set force in anterior cruciate ligament grafts.

Authors:  N J Stewart; L Engebretsen; J L Lewis; C Lindquist; W D Lew
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament lesions.

Authors:  J L Marshall; R F Warren; T L Wickiewicz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque.

Authors:  T Fukubayashi; P A Torzilli; M F Sherman; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation.

Authors:  M F Sherman; L Lieber; J R Bonamo; L Podesta; I Reiter
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  40 in total

1.  Anterior crucial ligament rupture: self-healing through dynamic intraligamentary stabilization technique.

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Hendrik Kohlhof; Max Hartel; Harald Bonel; Phillip Henle; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The effect of skeletal maturity on functional healing of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Martha M Murray; Elise M Magarian; Sophia L Harrison; Ashley N Mastrangelo; David Zurakowski; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Sex Influences the Biomechanical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Preclinical Large Animal Model.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Braden C Fleming; Benedikt L Proffen; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Biomechanics of the porcine triple bundle anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Yuki Kato; Sheila J M Ingham; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Takashi Horaguchi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Validation of porcine knee as a sex-specific model to study human anterior cruciate ligament disorders.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Matthew R Shalvoy; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Increased platelet concentration does not improve functional graft healing in bio-enhanced ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Benedikt L Proffen; Patrick Vavken; Matthew R Shalvoy; Jason T Machan; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Biomechanical outcomes after bioenhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are equal in a porcine model.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Braden C Fleming; Ashley N Mastrangelo; Jason T Machan; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  [Ligament bracing--augmented cruciate ligament sutures: biomechanical studies of a new treatment concept].

Authors:  M Heitmann; A Dratzidis; M Jagodzinski; P Wohlmuth; C Hurschler; K Püschel; A Giannakos; A Preiss; K-H Frosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Platelet-rich plasma alone is not sufficient to enhance suture repair of the ACL in skeletally immature animals: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Martha M Murray; Matthew Palmer; Eduardo Abreu; Kurt P Spindler; David Zurakowski; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Collagen scaffold supplementation does not improve the functional properties of the repaired anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Elise M Magarian; Sophia L Harrison; David J Paller; Martha M Murray
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.