Alisha J Rovner1, Kimberly O O'Brien. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd, Room 7B13A, MSC 7510, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. rovneral@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in US children. DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified by searching MEDLINE using 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D, hypovitaminosis D, vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D deficiency, children, and adolescents as key words and by screening references from original studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they fulfilled the following a priori criteria: contained a well-defined sample of children, included only healthy children, presented data on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, were published in the past 10 years, and were conducted in the United States. DATA EXTRACTION: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and prevalence of low vitamin D status (hypovitaminosis D). DATA SYNTHESIS: Fourteen articles fulfilled the criteria. There were no consistent definitions of hypovitaminosis D; values corresponding to vitamin D deficiency ranged from less than 5 ng/mL to less than 12 ng/mL, and those for vitamin D insufficiency ranged from less than 10 ng/mL to less than 32 ng/mL (to convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496). The following assays were used: radioimmunoassay (7 studies), competitive binding protein assay (3 studies), automated chemiluminescence protein-binding assay (3 studies), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (1 study). Breastfed infants in winter who did not receive vitamin D supplementation were the most severely vitamin D deficient (78%). Estimates of the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D ranged from 1% to 78%. Older age, winter season, higher body mass index, black race/ethnicity, and elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations were associated with lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. CONCLUSION: Although overt vitamin D deficiency is no longer common in US children, lesser degrees of vitamin D insufficiency are widespread.
OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in US children. DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified by searching MEDLINE using 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D, hypovitaminosis D, vitamin Dinsufficiency, vitamin D deficiency, children, and adolescents as key words and by screening references from original studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they fulfilled the following a priori criteria: contained a well-defined sample of children, included only healthy children, presented data on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, were published in the past 10 years, and were conducted in the United States. DATA EXTRACTION: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and prevalence of low vitamin D status (hypovitaminosis D). DATA SYNTHESIS: Fourteen articles fulfilled the criteria. There were no consistent definitions of hypovitaminosis D; values corresponding to vitamin D deficiency ranged from less than 5 ng/mL to less than 12 ng/mL, and those for vitamin Dinsufficiency ranged from less than 10 ng/mL to less than 32 ng/mL (to convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496). The following assays were used: radioimmunoassay (7 studies), competitive binding protein assay (3 studies), automated chemiluminescence protein-binding assay (3 studies), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (1 study). Breastfed infants in winter who did not receive vitamin D supplementation were the most severely vitamin D deficient (78%). Estimates of the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D ranged from 1% to 78%. Older age, winter season, higher body mass index, black race/ethnicity, and elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations were associated with lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. CONCLUSION: Although overt vitamin D deficiency is no longer common in US children, lesser degrees of vitamin Dinsufficiency are widespread.
Authors: Kathleen J Motil; Judy O Barrish; Jane Lane; Suzanne P Geerts; Fran Annese; Lauren McNair; Alan K Percy; Steven A Skinner; Jeffrey L Neul; Daniel G Glaze Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Adam R Aluisio; Zabihullah Maroof; Daniel Chandramohan; Jane Bruce; M Zulf Mughal; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Gijs Walraven; Mohammad I Masher; Jeroen H J Ensink; Semira Manaseki-Holland Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Yanbin Dong; Norman Pollock; Inger Susanne Stallmann-Jorgensen; Bernard Gutin; Ling Lan; Tai C Chen; Daniel Keeton; Karen Petty; Michael F Holick; Haidong Zhu Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kumaravel Rajakumar; Michael F Holick; Kwonho Jeong; Charity G Moore; Tai C Chen; Flora Olabopo; Mary Ann Haralam; Anita Nucci; Stephen B Thomas; Susan L Greenspan Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Helen M Pappa; Eveline J Langereis; Richard J Grand; Catherine M Gordon Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Sara S Oberhelman; Michael E Meekins; Philip R Fischer; Bernard R Lee; Ravinder J Singh; Stephen S Cha; Brian M Gardner; John M Pettifor; Ivana T Croghan; Tom D Thacher Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 7.616