Literature DB >> 18524458

Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations.

Roald Flesland Havre1, Erlend Elde, Odd Helge Gilja, Svein Odegaard, Geir Egil Eide, Knut Matre, Lars Birger Nesje.   

Abstract

Real-time elastography is a method for visualization of the elastic properties of soft tissue and may potentially enable differentiation between malignant and benign pathologic lesions. Our aim was to validate the method on a tissue-mimicking (TM) phantom and to evaluate the influence of different scanning parameters and investigator variability. A TM-phantom containing eight spherical inclusions with known storage modulus was examined using two different transducers on an ultrasound (US) scanner equipped with software for real-time elasticity imaging. The ultrasound transducers were moved vertically in a repetitive manner to induce strain. Two investigators performed series of standardized elastography scans applying a 0-4 categorical quality scale to evaluate the influence of seven parameters: dynamic range of elasticity, region-of-interest, frequency of transducer movement, rejection of elastogram noise, frame rate, persistence and smoothing. Subsequently, repeated examinations of four selected inclusions were performed using a visual analog scale (VAS) where investigators marked a 100 mm horizontal line representing the span in image quality based on experience from the first examination. The hardest and softest inclusions were imaged more clearly than the inclusions with elasticity more similar to the background material. Intraobserver agreement on elastogram quality was good (kappa: 0.67 - 0.75) and interobserver agreement average (kappa: 0.55 - 0.56) when using the categorical scale. The subsequent VAS evaluation gave intraclass-correlation coefficients for the two observers of 0.98 and 0.93, respectively, and an interclass-correlation coefficient of 0.93. Real-time elastography adequately visualized isoechoic inclusions with different elastic properties in a TM-phantom with acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement. Dynamic range of elasticity was the parameter with most impact on the elastographic visualization of inclusions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18524458     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  36 in total

1.  US-guided diffuse optical tomography for breast lesions: the reliability of clinical experience.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Ji Youn Kim; Jung Hyun Youn; Myung Hyun Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Soo Jin Kim; Yu-Mee Sohn; Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Myung-Joon Kim; Ha Yan Kim; Yun Ho Roh; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative analysis of diagnosing pancreatic fibrosis using EUS-elastography (comparison with surgical specimens).

Authors:  Yuya Itoh; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hajime Sumi; Daijuro Hayashi; Takamichi Kuwahara; Tomomasa Morishima; Kohei Funasaka; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Naoki Ohmiya; Yoshiaki Katano; Masatoshi Ishigami; Hidemi Goto; Yoshiki Hirooka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  "Soft, hard, or just right?" Applications and limitations of axial-strain sonoelastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injuries.

Authors:  C C Ooi; P Malliaras; M E Schneider; D A Connell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Liver elastography, comments on EFSUMB elastography guidelines 2013.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Chiara De Molo; Andre Ignee; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity.

Authors:  Peter N T Wells; Hai-Dong Liang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Extensor tendinopathy of the elbow assessed with sonoelastography: histologic correlation.

Authors:  Andrea S Klauser; Mathias Pamminger; Ethan J Halpern; Mohamed M H Abd Ellah; Bernhard Moriggl; Mihra S Taljanovic; Christian Deml; Judit Sztankay; Guenther Klima; Werner R Jaschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effects of compression force on elasticity index and elasticity ratio in ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  A Imaizumi; Y Sasaki; J Sakamoto; T Kamio; K Nishikawa; M Otonari-Yamamoto; M Wako
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 9.  Strain Elastography - How To Do It?

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Richard G Barr; André Farrokh; Manjiri Dighe; Michael Hocke; Christian Jenssen; Yi Dong; Adrian Saftoiu; Roald Flesland Havre
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-12-07

Review 10.  Sonography of the small intestine.

Authors:  Kim Nylund; Svein Ødegaard; Trygve Hausken; Geir Folvik; Gülen Arslan Lied; Ivan Viola; Helwig Hauser; Odd-Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.