Literature DB >> 18523572

Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing.

Lindsay J DiStefano1, Darin A Padua, Cathleen N Brown, Kevin M Guskiewicz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Long-term effects of ankle bracing on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are unknown. Ankle motion restriction may negatively affect the body's ability to attenuate ground reaction forces (GRFs).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate and long-term effects of ankle bracing on lower extremity kinematics and GRFs during a jump landing.
DESIGN: Experimental mixed model (2 [group] x 2 [brace] x 2 [time]) with repeated measures.
SETTING: Sports medicine research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 37 healthy subjects were assigned randomly to either the intervention (n = 11 men, 8 women; age = 19.63 +/- 0.72 years, height = 176.05 +/- 10.58 cm, mass = 71.50 +/- 13.15 kg) or control group (n = 11 men, 7 women; age = 19.94 +/- 1.44 years, height = 179.15 +/- 8.81 cm, mass = 74.10 +/- 10.33 kg). INTERVENTION(S): The intervention group wore braces on both ankles and the control group did not wear braces during all recreational activities for an 8-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Initial ground contact angles, maximum joint angles, time to reach maximum joint angles, and joint range of motion for sagittal-plane knee and ankle motion were measured during a jump-landing task. Peak vertical GRF and the time to reach peak vertical GRF were assessed also.
RESULTS: While participants were wearing the brace, ankle plantar flexion at initial ground contact (brace = 35 degrees +/- 13 degrees , no brace = 38 degrees +/- 15 degrees , P = .024), maximum dorsiflexion (brace = 21 degrees +/- 7 degrees , no brace = 22 degrees +/- 6 degrees , P = .04), dorsiflexion range of motion (brace = 56 degrees +/- 14 degrees , no brace = 59 degrees +/- 16 degrees , P = .001), and knee flexion range of motion (brace = 79 degrees +/- 16 degrees , no brace = 82 degrees +/- 16 degrees , P = .036) decreased, whereas knee flexion at initial ground contact increased (brace = 12 degrees +/- 9 degrees , no brace = 9 degrees +/- 9 degrees , P = .0001). Wearing the brace for 8 weeks did not affect any of the outcome measures, and the brace caused no changes in vertical GRFs (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although ankle sagittal-plane motion was restricted with the brace, knee flexion upon landing increased and peak vertical GRF did not change. The type of lace-up brace used in this study appeared to restrict ankle motion without increasing knee extension or vertical GRFs and without changing kinematics or kinetics over time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  braces, external ankle supports; injury prevention; landings; prophylactic

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523572      PMCID: PMC2386429          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  29 in total

1.  Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings.

Authors:  S N Zhang; B T Bates; J S Dufek
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Effect of ankle taping and bracing on vertical ground reaction forces during drop landings before and after treadmill jogging.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Randy J Schmitz; Michael Gale; Steven T McCaw
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity.

Authors:  P Devita; W A Skelly
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains.

Authors:  J G Garrick
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The shock attenuation role of the ankle during landing from a vertical jump.

Authors:  T S Gross; R C Nelson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries.

Authors:  G D Rovere; T J Clarke; C S Yates; K Burley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Benefits, risks, and costs of alternative approaches to the evaluation and treatment of severe ankle sprain.

Authors:  S H Soboroff; E M Pappius; A L Komaroff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A one season prospective cohort study of volleyball injuries.

Authors:  E A L M Verhagen; A J Van der Beek; L M Bouter; R M Bahr; W Van Mechelen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in soccer players using the Sport-Stirrup orthosis.

Authors:  I Surve; M P Schwellnus; T Noakes; C Lombard
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  19 in total

1.  Lateral and syndesmotic ankle sprain injuries: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Joshua C Dubin; Doug Comeau; Rebecca I McClelland; Rachel A Dubin; Ernest Ferrel
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-07-23

2.  The influence of heel height on sagittal plane knee kinematics during landing tasks in recreationally active and athletic collegiate females.

Authors:  Kelly M Lindenberg; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps; Robroy L Martin; Anne M Burrows
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

3.  Weight-Bearing Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Matthew C Hoch; Kelley E Farwell; Stacey L Gaven; Joshua T Weinhandl
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The influence of heel height on vertical ground reaction force during landing tasks in recreationally active and athletic collegiate females.

Authors:  Kelly M Lindenberg; Christopher R Carcia
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-02

5.  Gait kinematics after taping in participants with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Lisa Chinn; Jay Dicharry; Joseph M Hart; Susan Saliba; Robert Wilder; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing-lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion.

Authors:  Karli E Dill; Rebecca L Begalle; Barnett S Frank; Steven M Zinder; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Effects of Prophylactic Ankle Supports on Vertical Ground Reaction Force During Landing: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wenxin Niu; Tienan Feng; Lejun Wang; Chenghua Jiang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  The effect of lace-up ankle braces on injury rates in high school football players.

Authors:  Timothy A McGuine; Scott Hetzel; John Wilson; Alison Brooks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Peak Lower Extremity Landing Kinematics in Dancers and Nondancers.

Authors:  Bethany L Hansberger; Shellie Acocello; Lindsay V Slater; Joseph M Hart; Jatin P Ambegaonkar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Effect of ankle braces on lower extremity muscle activation during functional exercises in participants with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Mark A Feger; Luke Donovan; Joe M Hart; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.