Literature DB >> 18523459

Population exposure to fine particles and estimated excess mortality in Finland from an East European wildfire episode.

Otto O Hänninen1, Raimo O Salonen, Kimmo Koistinen, Timo Lanki, Lars Barregard, Matti Jantunen.   

Abstract

Long-range transported particulate matter (PM) air pollution episodes associated with wildfires in the Eastern Europe are relatively common in Southern and Southeastern Finland. In severe cases such as in August-September 2002, the reduced visibility and smell of the smoke, and symptoms such as irritation of eyes and airways experienced by the population raise the issue into the headlines. Because PM air pollution, in general, has been identified as a major health risk, and the exposures are of repeating nature, the issue warrants a risk assessment to estimate the magnitude of the problem. The current work uses the available air quality data in Finland to estimate population exposures caused by one of the worst episodes experienced in this decade. This episode originated from wildfires in Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and the Baltic countries. The populations of 11 Southern Finnish provinces were exposed between 26 August and 8 September 2002, for 2 weeks to an additional population-weighted average PM(2.5) level of 15.7 microg/m(3). Assuming similar effect on mortality for these particles as observed in epidemiological time series studies on urban particles (0.5%-2% increase in mortality per 10 microg/m(3), central estimate 1%), this exposure level would be associated with 9-34 cases (17 cases central estimate) of additional mortality. Epidemiological evidence specific to particles from biomass combustion is scarce, affecting also the reliability of the current risk assessment. Do the wildfire aerosols exhibit the same level of toxicity as the urban particles? To shed light on this question, it is interesting to look at the exposure data in relationship to the observed daily mortality in Finland, even though the limited duration of the episode allows only for a weak statistical power. The percentage increases observed (0.8%-2.1% per 10 microg/m(3) of fine PM) are in line with the more general estimates for urban PM and those used in the current risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523459     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2008.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  23 in total

Review 1.  Climate change. A global threat to cardiopulmonary health.

Authors:  Mary B Rice; George D Thurston; John R Balmes; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Risk of respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalisation with exposure to bushfire particulates: new evidence from Darwin, Australia.

Authors:  Helen Crabbe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Projection of wildfire activity in southern California in the mid-21st century.

Authors:  Xu Yue; Loretta J Mickley; Jennifer A Logan
Journal:  Clim Dyn       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.375

4.  Application of an Original Wildfire Smoke Health Cost Benefits Transfer Protocol to the Western US, 2005-2015.

Authors:  Benjamin A Jones; Robert P Berrens
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke.

Authors:  Jia C Liu; Gavin Pereira; Sarah A Uhl; Mercedes A Bravo; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Particulate Air Pollution from Wildfires in the Western US under Climate Change.

Authors:  Jia Coco Liu; Loretta J Mickley; Melissa P Sulprizio; Francesca Dominici; Xu Yue; Keita Ebisu; Georgiana Brooke Anderson; Rafi F A Khan; Mercedes A Bravo; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 4.743

7.  California wildfires of 2008: coarse and fine particulate matter toxicity.

Authors:  Teresa C Wegesser; Kent E Pinkerton; Jerold A Last
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Wildfire smoke exposure and human health: Significant gaps in research for a growing public health issue.

Authors:  Carolyn Black; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Jed A Bassein; Lisa A Miller
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.860

9.  Health Impact Assessment of the 2020 Washington State Wildfire Smoke Episode: Excess Health Burden Attributable to Increased PM2.5 Exposures and Potential Exposure Reductions.

Authors:  Yisi Liu; Elena Austin; Jianbang Xiang; Tim Gould; Tim Larson; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2021-05-01

10.  Birth weight following pregnancy during the 2003 Southern California wildfires.

Authors:  David M Holstius; Colleen E Reid; Bill M Jesdale; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.