Literature DB >> 18523339

Manufacture of degradable polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Zigang Ge1, Zhaoxia Jin, Tong Cao.   

Abstract

Many innovative technology platforms for promoting bone regeneration have been developed. A common theme among these is the use of scaffolds to provide mechanical support and osteoconduction. Scaffolds can be either ceramic or polymer-based, or composites of both classes of material. Both ceramics and polymers have their own merits and drawbacks, and a better solution may be to synergize the advantageous properties of both materials within composite scaffolds. In this current review, after a brief introduction of the anatomy and physiology of bone, different strategies of fabricating polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration, including traditional and solid free-form fabrication, are critically discussed and compared, while focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of individual techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523339     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/022001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  9 in total

Review 1.  A tissue-engineered approach towards retinal repair: scaffolds for cell transplantation to the subretinal space.

Authors:  Sara Royce Hynes; Erin B Lavik
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  In Vitro Biocompatibility and Degradation Analysis of Mass-Produced Collagen Fibers.

Authors:  Kiran M Ali; Yihan Huang; Alaowei Y Amanah; Nasif Mahmood; Taylor C Suh; Jessica M Gluck
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Scaffold/Extracellular matrix hybrid constructs for bone-tissue engineering.

Authors:  Richard A Thibault; Antonios G Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  The biocompatibility of bone cements: progress in methodological approach.

Authors:  Carlo Dall'Oca; Tommaso Maluta; Gian Mario Micheloni; Matteo Cengarle; Giampaolo Morbioli; Paolo Bernardi; Andrea Sbarbati; Daniele Degl'Innocenti; Franco Lavini; Bruno Magnan
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Fabrication of Mechanically Reinforced Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite Bio-Composite Scaffolds by Core/Shell Nozzle Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Haeri Kim; Hanjun Hwangbo; YoungWon Koo; GeunHyung Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Fabrication and Characterization of Scaffolds of Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Biosilicate® Biocomposites Prepared by Generative Manufacturing Process.

Authors:  Daniel Aparecido Lopes Vieira da Cunha; Paulo Inforçatti Neto; Kelli Cristina Micocci; Caroline Faria Bellani; Heloisa Sobreiro Selistre-de-Araujo; Zilda Castro Silveira; Marcia Cristina Branciforti
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2019-02-03

Review 7.  Advances in Biodegradable 3D Printed Scaffolds with Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sara Lopez de Armentia; Juan Carlos Del Real; Eva Paz; Nicholas Dunne
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Use of buccal fat pad-derived stem cells cultured on bioceramics for repair of critical-sized mandibular defects in healthy and osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  Fabio Camacho-Alonso; M R Tudela-Mulero; J A Navarro; A J Buendía; A M Mercado-Díaz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 9.  Current progress in bioactive ceramic scaffolds for bone repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Chengde Gao; Youwen Deng; Pei Feng; Zhongzheng Mao; Pengjian Li; Bo Yang; Junjie Deng; Yiyuan Cao; Cijun Shuai; Shuping Peng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.