Harold A Pollack1, Thomas D'Aunno. 1. Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago, 969 East 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA. haroldp@uchicago.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which U.S. methadone maintenance facilities meet established standards for minimum dosages, 1988-2005. DATA SOURCE: Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of outpatient treatment facilities in 1988 (n=172), 1990 (n=140), 1995 (n=116), 2000 (n=150), and 2005 (n=146). STUDY DESIGN: Random-effects multiple regression analysis was used to examine unit characteristics associated with below recommended doses. DATA COLLECTION: Data regarding the proportion of patients who received maintenance dosages of <40, 60, and 80 mg/day were collected from unit directors and clinical supervisors. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Forty-four percent of patients receive doses of at least 80 mg/day--the threshold identified as recommended practice in recent work. Thirty-four percent of patients receive doses below 60 mg/day, while 17 percent receive doses below 40 mg/day. Units that serve a high proportion of African American or Latino clients were more likely to report low-dose care. Units managed by individuals who strongly favor abstinence models (e.g., Narcotics Anonymous) were more likely to provide low-dose care. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of methadone facilities provide doses below recommended levels. Managerial attitudes about abstinence and their relationship to low doses underscore the contested role of methadone in treatment of opiate disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which U.S. methadone maintenance facilities meet established standards for minimum dosages, 1988-2005. DATA SOURCE: Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of outpatient treatment facilities in 1988 (n=172), 1990 (n=140), 1995 (n=116), 2000 (n=150), and 2005 (n=146). STUDY DESIGN: Random-effects multiple regression analysis was used to examine unit characteristics associated with below recommended doses. DATA COLLECTION: Data regarding the proportion of patients who received maintenance dosages of <40, 60, and 80 mg/day were collected from unit directors and clinical supervisors. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Forty-four percent of patients receive doses of at least 80 mg/day--the threshold identified as recommended practice in recent work. Thirty-four percent of patients receive doses below 60 mg/day, while 17 percent receive doses below 40 mg/day. Units that serve a high proportion of African American or Latino clients were more likely to report low-dose care. Units managed by individuals who strongly favor abstinence models (e.g., Narcotics Anonymous) were more likely to provide low-dose care. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of methadone facilities provide doses below recommended levels. Managerial attitudes about abstinence and their relationship to low doses underscore the contested role of methadone in treatment of opiate disorders.
Authors: Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter D Friedmann; Jeffrey A Alexander; Yining Yey; Tammie Nahra; Soheil Soliman; Harold A Pollack Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Alexander Y Walley; Debbie M Cheng; Courtney E Pierce; Clara Chen; Tiffany Filippell; Jeffrey H Samet; Daniel P Alford Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Christina Andrews; Amanda Abraham; Colleen M Grogan; Harold A Pollack; Clifford Bersamira; Keith Humphreys; Peter Friedmann Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Linn Gjersing; Helge Waal; John R M Caplehorn; Michael Gossop; Thomas Clausen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Jerome H Jaffe; Sharon M Kelly; C Patrick Myers; Kevin E O'Grady; Yngvild K Olsen; Robert P Schwartz Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2013-04-05
Authors: Carla Marienfeld; Pulin Liu; Xia Wang; Richard Schottenfeld; Wang Zhou; Marek C Chawarski Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 4.492