Literature DB >> 18522640

Quantitative endoscopy in the chemoprevention of Barrett's Esophagus Trial.

A O Shar1, Marie A Gaudard, Elisabeth I Heath, Arlene A Forastiere, Vincent W Yang, Stephen J Sontag.   

Abstract

The Chemoprevention for Barrett's Esophagus Trial (CBET) was a phase IIb, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of celecoxib in patients with Barrett's esophagus. The overall outcome of the study was that there were no significant differences in primary, secondary, or tertiary outcomes. The purpose of the current study is to focus on results related to the method of measuring lesion size called quantitative endoscopy (QE). The design includes a review of a total number of studies and then restricts analyses to the four clinics that enrolled more than four patients each for whom a baseline and 1-year QE study was performed, comparing intra- and inter-patient and clinic differences in Barrett's esophagus. Measurements include the number of total QEs and adverse events, changes in areas from baseline to 1 year and other intervals, classification of Barrett's lesion type with respect to patients, clinics, and treatment. A total of 309 QE studies were completed with no adverse events. Differences in surface area measurements over time for a particular patient are smaller than the differences for randomly selected patients. The complexity mix (as defined by the mix of circumferential, tongues, and islands) of the Barrett's lesions varied with different clinics. In conclusion, QE is an efficient, safe, and accurate way to measure the area of Barrett's lesions variation between different clinical sites may be attributable to a subtle type of selection bias at the individual clinics rather than to regional differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18522640      PMCID: PMC3612967          DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00835.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  N J Shaheen; M A Crosby; E M Bozymski; R S Sandler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Secondary chemoprevention of Barrett's esophagus with celecoxib: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Elisabeth I Heath; Marcia Irene Canto; Steven Piantadosi; Elizabeth Montgomery; Wilfred M Weinstein; James G Herman; Andrew J Dannenberg; Vincent W Yang; Albert O Shar; Ernest Hawk; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The incidence of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective study of 170 patients followed 4.8 years.

Authors:  D J Drewitz; R E Sampliner; H S Garewal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Extent of Barrett's metaplasia: a prospective study of the serial change in area of Barrett's measured by quantitative endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  R Kim; S Rose; A O Shar; M Weiner; J C Reynolds
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Automated reconstruction of endoscopic images of the esophagus.

Authors:  A Shar; M Weiner; R Kim; J Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

6.  Quantitative endoscopy: precise computerized measurement of metaplastic epithelial surface area in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  R Kim; B B Baggott; S Rose; A O Shar; D L Mallory; S S Lasky; M Kressloff; L Y Faccenda; J C Reynolds
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States.

Authors:  S S Devesa; W J Blot; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction in white men in the United States: alcohol, tobacco, and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  L M Brown; D T Silverman; L M Pottern; J B Schoenberg; R S Greenberg; G M Swanson; J M Liff; A G Schwartz; R B Hayes; W J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Chemoprevention for Barrett's esophagus trial. Design and outcome measures.

Authors:  E I Heath; M I Canto; T-T Wu; S Piantadosi; E Hawk; A Unalp; G Gordon; A A Forastiere
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.429

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Computer-assisted 3D bowel length measurement for quantitative laparoscopy.

Authors:  Martin Wagner; Benjamin Friedrich Berthold Mayer; Sebastian Bodenstedt; Katherine Stemmer; Arash Fereydooni; Stefanie Speidel; Rüdiger Dillmann; Felix Nickel; Lars Fischer; Hannes Götz Kenngott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

3.  Modeling using baseline characteristics in a small multicenter clinical trial for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Albert O Shar; Marie A Gaudard; Elisabeth I Heath; Arlene A Forastiere; Vincent W Yang; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.