OBJECTIVE: To compare separate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay-specific artificial neural networks (ANN) for discrimination between patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and no evidence of malignancy (NEM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 780 patients (455 with PCa, 325 with NEM) we measured total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) with five different assays: from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), DPC (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010) and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur). ANN models were developed with five input factors: tPSA, percentage free/total PSA (%fPSA), age, prostate volume and digital rectal examination status for each assay separately to examine two tPSA ranges of 0-10 and 10-27 ng/mL. RESULTS: Compared with the median tPSA concentrations (range from 4.9 [Bayer] to 6.11 ng/mL [DPC]) and especially the median %fPSA values (range from 11.2 [DPC] to 17.4%[Abbott], for tPSA 0-10 ng/mL), the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for all calculated ANN models did not significantly differ from each other. The AUC were: 0.894 (Abbott), 0.89 (Bayer), 0.895 (Beckman), 0.882 (DPC) and 0.892 (Roche). At 95% sensitivity the specificities were without significant differences, whereas the individual absolute ANN outputs differed markedly. CONCLUSIONS: Despite only slight differences, PSA assay-specific ANN models should be used to optimize the ANN outcome to reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies. We further developed the ANN named 'ProstataClass' to provide clinicians with an easy to use tool in making their decision about follow-up testing.
OBJECTIVE: To compare separate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay-specific artificial neural networks (ANN) for discrimination between patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and no evidence of malignancy (NEM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 780 patients (455 with PCa, 325 with NEM) we measured total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) with five different assays: from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), DPC (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010) and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur). ANN models were developed with five input factors: tPSA, percentage free/total PSA (%fPSA), age, prostate volume and digital rectal examination status for each assay separately to examine two tPSA ranges of 0-10 and 10-27 ng/mL. RESULTS: Compared with the median tPSA concentrations (range from 4.9 [Bayer] to 6.11 ng/mL [DPC]) and especially the median %fPSA values (range from 11.2 [DPC] to 17.4%[Abbott], for tPSA 0-10 ng/mL), the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for all calculated ANN models did not significantly differ from each other. The AUC were: 0.894 (Abbott), 0.89 (Bayer), 0.895 (Beckman), 0.882 (DPC) and 0.892 (Roche). At 95% sensitivity the specificities were without significant differences, whereas the individual absolute ANN outputs differed markedly. CONCLUSIONS: Despite only slight differences, PSA assay-specific ANN models should be used to optimize the ANN outcome to reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies. We further developed the ANN named 'ProstataClass' to provide clinicians with an easy to use tool in making their decision about follow-up testing.
Authors: Esther Llop; Montserrat Ferrer-Batallé; Sílvia Barrabés; Pedro Enrique Guerrero; Manel Ramírez; Radka Saldova; Pauline M Rudd; Rosa N Aleixandre; Josep Comet; Rafael de Llorens; Rosa Peracaula Journal: Theranostics Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Thorsten H Ecke; Steffen Hallmann; Stefan Koch; Jürgen Ruttloff; Henning Cammann; Holger Gerullis; Kurt Miller; Carsten Stephan Journal: ISRN Urol Date: 2012-07-05