Literature DB >> 18520976

Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of chlamydial and gonococcal infections of the oropharynx and rectum in men who have sex with men.

Julius Schachter1, Jeanne Moncada, Sally Liska, Clara Shayevich, Jeffrey D Klausner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are US Food and Drug Administration-cleared for detecting urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infection, but they have not been adequately evaluated for the relatively common oropharyngeal or rectal CT and GC infections in men who have sex with men (MSM).
METHODS: Multiple swabs were collected from the oropharynx and rectum of MSM attending a city sexually transmitted disease clinic. The specimens were tested by standard culture and the following NAATs: Roche's Amplicor (PCR), Becton Dickinson's ProbeTec (SDA), and Gen-Probe's APTIMA Combo 2 (AC2) for the detection of CT and GC. Confirmatory testing of specimens with discrepant results was done by NAATs using alternate primers.
RESULTS: A total of 1110 MSM were enrolled. Based on initial findings on 205 MSM, PCR had a 78.9% GC specificity with oropharyngeal swabs. Thus, we discontinued PCR testing for the rest of the study. For oropharyngeal GC (89 infections detected), sensitivities were 41% for culture, 72% for SDA, and 84% for AC2. For rectal GC (88 infections detected), sensitivities were 43% for culture, 78% for SDA and 93% for AC2. For oropharyngeal CT (9 infections detected), sensitivities were 44% for culture, 67% for SDA, and 100% for AC2. For rectal CT (68 infections detected), sensitivities were 27% for culture, 63% for SDA, and 93% for AC2. Specificities of SDA and AC2 were > or =99.4% for both organisms and anatomical sites.
CONCLUSIONS: AC2 and SDA were far superior to culture for the detection of CT or GC from the oropharynx and rectum with AC2 detecting twice as many infections as culture. Further analyses with larger pharyngeal samples are needed, but clearly NAATs can improve our ability to diagnose rectal and oropharyngeal infection with CT or GC in MSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520976     DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31817bdd7e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  68 in total

1.  Routine confirmation of positive nucleic acid amplification test results for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is not necessary.

Authors:  Julius Schachter; Max A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Differing Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacterial loads in the pharynx and rectum in men who have sex with men: implications for gonococcal detection, transmission, and control.

Authors:  M Bissessor; S N Tabrizi; C K Fairley; J Danielewski; B Whitton; S Bird; S Garland; M Y Chen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Antibiotic resistance in Chlamydiae.

Authors:  Kelsi M Sandoz; Daniel D Rockey
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  Evaluation of the New BD Max GC Real-Time PCR Assay, Analytically and Clinically as a Supplementary Test for the BD ProbeTec GC Qx Amplified DNA Assay, for Molecular Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Daniel Golparian; Stina Boräng; Martin Sundqvist; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis rectal infections.

Authors:  Laura H Bachmann; Robert E Johnson; Hong Cheng; Lauri Markowitz; John R Papp; Frank J Palella; Edward W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Gonorrhoea.

Authors:  Sarah Creighton
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-02-21

7.  Gonococcal cellulitis: an (un)friendly bite.

Authors:  Amos Lal; Alwyn Rapose
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Chlamydia trachomatis today: treatment, detection, immunogenetics and the need for a greater global understanding of chlamydial disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  D Dean
Journal:  Drugs Today (Barc)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.245

9.  The cost-effectiveness of screening men who have sex with men for rectal chlamydial and gonococcal infection to prevent HIV Infection.

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Kyle T Bernstein; Thomas L Gift; Julia L Marcus; Sharon Pipkin; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Expansion of Comprehensive Screening of Male Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Attendees with Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis Molecular Assessment: a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Erik Munson; David Wenten; Sheila Jhansale; Mary Kay Schuknecht; Nicki Pantuso; Joshua Gerritts; Aaron Steward; Kimber L Munson; Maureen Napierala; Deb Hamer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.