BACKGROUND: Traditionally in pediatric HIV, the CD4+ T-lymphocyte percent is used to monitor disease progression because of the variability in absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte numbers. Because of the high cost of equipment, sophisticated and delicate technology, most laboratories in resource-limited settings use simple protocols that enumerate only the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. We assessed the use of absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count as a surrogate marker of pediatric HIV disease progression. METHODS: We analyzed the CD4+ T-lymphocytes and HIV viral load over a 10-year period (1996-2006) of 97 HIV-infected children enrolled in the Yale Prospective Longitudinal Pediatric HIV Cohort using generalized linear mixed models. Both CD4+ T-lymphocytes and HIV viral load were assessed at baseline and every 2-3 months. The modeling approach used in this study allows the intercept and the rate at which outcome variables change over time to vary across participants. RESULTS: We determined that absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes count was just as reliable at monitoring pediatric HIV as CD4+ T-lymphocyte percentage. Antiretroviral treatment, regardless of the regimen used, was associated with higher CD+ T-lymphocytes count (P < 0.01). Race was significantly associated with CD4+ T-lymphocytes counts (with lower values for blacks compared with nonblacks; P < 0.01). The presence of other infections was associated with lower CD4+ T-lymphocyte count (P = 0.01) and higher viral load (P < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In situations where determination of CD4+ T-lymphocyte percentages is not readily available, the absolute count may provide an affordable and accessible laboratory surrogate marker of HIV disease progression in children.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally in pediatric HIV, the CD4+ T-lymphocyte percent is used to monitor disease progression because of the variability in absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte numbers. Because of the high cost of equipment, sophisticated and delicate technology, most laboratories in resource-limited settings use simple protocols that enumerate only the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. We assessed the use of absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count as a surrogate marker of pediatric HIV disease progression. METHODS: We analyzed the CD4+ T-lymphocytes and HIV viral load over a 10-year period (1996-2006) of 97 HIV-infectedchildren enrolled in the Yale Prospective Longitudinal Pediatric HIV Cohort using generalized linear mixed models. Both CD4+ T-lymphocytes and HIV viral load were assessed at baseline and every 2-3 months. The modeling approach used in this study allows the intercept and the rate at which outcome variables change over time to vary across participants. RESULTS: We determined that absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes count was just as reliable at monitoring pediatric HIV as CD4+ T-lymphocyte percentage. Antiretroviral treatment, regardless of the regimen used, was associated with higher CD+ T-lymphocytes count (P < 0.01). Race was significantly associated with CD4+ T-lymphocytes counts (with lower values for blacks compared with nonblacks; P < 0.01). The presence of other infections was associated with lower CD4+ T-lymphocyte count (P = 0.01) and higher viral load (P < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In situations where determination of CD4+ T-lymphocyte percentages is not readily available, the absolute count may provide an affordable and accessible laboratory surrogate marker of HIV disease progression in children.
Authors: Robert Colebunders; Kamya R Moses; John Laurence; Hasan M Shihab; Fred Semitala; Fred Lutwama; Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka; Lut Lynen; Lisa Spacek; Steven J Reynolds; Thomas C Quinn; Brant Viner; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Scott M Hammer; Michael S Saag; Mauro Schechter; Julio S G Montaner; Robert T Schooley; Donna M Jacobsen; Melanie A Thompson; Charles C J Carpenter; Margaret A Fischl; Brian G Gazzard; Jose M Gatell; Martin S Hirsch; David A Katzenstein; Douglas D Richman; Stefano Vella; Patrick G Yeni; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Benigno Rodríguez; Ajay K Sethi; Vinay K Cheruvu; Wilma Mackay; Ronald J Bosch; Mari Kitahata; Stephen L Boswell; W Christopher Mathews; David R Bangsberg; Jeffrey Martin; Christopher C Whalen; Scott Sieg; Suhrida Yadavalli; Steven G Deeks; Michael M Lederman Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-09-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Florence; J Lundgren; C Dreezen; M Fisher; O Kirk; A Blaxhult; G Panos; C Katlama; S Vella; A Phillips Journal: HIV Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Jason A Mendoza; Mary E Paul; Heidi Schwarzwald; Yan Liu; Richard Martinez; Theresa A Nicklas; Tom Baranowski Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2013-06
Authors: Onyekachi Anukam; Natalia Blanco; Jibreel Jumare; Julia Lo; Ezra Babatunde; Solomon Odafe; Dennis Onotu; Uzoma Ene; Johnson Fagbamigbe; Deborah Carpenter; Emilia D Rivadeneira; Austin I Omoigberale; Manhattan Charurat; Mahesh Swaminathan; Kristen A Stafford Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2022 Jan-Dec