Literature DB >> 18519628

What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management?

H Hogan1, S Olsen, S Scobie, E Chapman, R Sachs, M McKee, C Vincent, R Thomson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of data already existing within hospitals for monitoring patient safety.
SETTING: An acute hospital in southern England.
DESIGN: Mapping of data sources proposed by staff as potentially able to identify patient safety issues followed by an in-depth analysis of the content of seven key sources. Data source analysis: For each data source: scope and depth of content in relation to patient safety, number and type of patient safety incidents identified, degree of overlap with incidents identified by different sources, levels of patient harm associated with incidents.
RESULTS: A wide range of data sources existing within the hospital setting have the potential to provide information about patient safety incidents. Poor quality of coding, delays in reports reaching databases, the narrow focus of some data sources, limited data-collection periods and lack of central collation of findings were some of the barriers to making the best use of routine data sources for monitoring patient safety. An in-depth analysis of seven key data sources (Clinical Incident database, Health and Safety Incident database, Complaints database, Claims database and Inquest database, the Patient Administration System and case notes) indicated that case notes have the potential to identify the largest number of incidents and provide the richest source of information on such incidents. The seven data sources identified different types of incidents with differing levels of patient harm. There was little overlap between the incidents identified by different sources.
CONCLUSION: Despite issues related to the quality of coding, depth of information available and accessibility, triangulating information from more than one source can identify a broader range of incidents and provide additional information related to professional groups involved, types of patients affected and important contributory factors. Such an approach can provide a focus for further work and ultimately contributes to the identification of appropriate interventions that improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18519628     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  7 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of medication errors: the methodological difficulties.

Authors:  Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Detection of medication-related problems in hospital practice: a review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Manias
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Prevention of medication errors: detection and audit.

Authors:  Germana Montesi; Alessandro Lechi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Relationship between preventable hospital deaths and other measures of safety: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Helen Hogan; Frances Healey; Graham Neale; Richard Thomson; Charles Vincent; Nick Black
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Validating administrative data for the detection of adverse events in older hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz; Susan K Bowles; Lorri Giffin
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2014-08-13

6.  Development of a validation algorithm for 'present on admission' flagging.

Authors:  Terri J Jackson; Jude L Michel; Rosemary Roberts; Jennie Shepheard; Diana Cheng; Julie Rust; Catherine Perry
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Retrospective record review in proactive patient safety work - identification of no-harm incidents.

Authors:  Kristina Schildmeijer; Maria Unbeck; Olav Muren; Joep Perk; Karin Pukk Härenstam; Lena Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.