Literature DB >> 18519328

The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Rafael J Sierra1, John Charity, Eleftherios Tsiridis, John A Timperley, Graham A Gie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following revision total hip arthroplasty involving femoral impaction grafting, fractures usually have occurred distal to a standard-length stem in an area of weakened bone that was left inadequately supported. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the use of a long stem decreases the rate of femoral fracture after revision hip surgery. We hypothesized that the use of a long-stem femoral component would decrease the risk of these fractures.
METHODS: From 1991 to 2000, 567 revision total hip arthroplasties were performed with use of femoral impaction grafting. Of these, forty-two procedures in forty patients (average age, 73.8 years) were performed with use of a stem that was > or = 220 mm in length. The average number of previous revisions was 1.85. Thirty-four of the forty hips with preoperative radiographs had preoperative bone loss that was classified as grade III or IV according to the Endo-Klinik system. Major complications were recorded, and survival analysis was performed.
RESULTS: No patient was lost to follow-up. Sixteen patients (sixteen hips) died at an average of fifty-two months postoperatively. The average duration of clinical follow-up for the hips in which the implant survived for more than forty-eight months was 7.5 years. The rate of major postoperative complications was 29%. Two postoperative femoral fractures occurred. Six patients (six hips) required a femoral reoperation. The survival rate with revision hip surgery as the end point was 90% at both five and ten years. The rate of survival with any failure as the end point was 82% at five years and 64% at ten years.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a long stem for femoral impaction grafting did not completely resolve the problem of postoperative fractures in these patients with substantial loss of bone stock undergoing revision hip surgery. Poor bone stock, technical errors, and other patient-related factors continue to account for the high postoperative fracture rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18519328     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

Review 1.  Revision arthroplasty: an update.

Authors:  D Williams; A Taylor; P McLardy-Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Femoral impaction grafting.

Authors:  John A Scanelli; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-01-18

3.  Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Howie; S A Callary; M A McGee; N C Russell; L B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Hernigou Philippe; Nicolas Dupuys; Dupuys Nicolas; Jerome Delambre; Delambre Jerome; Isaac Guissou; Guissou Isaac; Alexandre Poignard; Poignard Alexandre; Jerome Allain; Allain Jerome; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Proximal femoral reconstructions with bone impaction grafting and metal mesh.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A MODULAR CEMENTLESS DISTAL FIXATION PROSTHESIS: THE ZMR(®) HIP SYSTEM. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF 30 CASES.

Authors:  Richard Prazeres Canella; Paulo Gilberto Cimbalista de Alencar; Gerson Gandhi Ganev; Luiz Fernando de Vincenzi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.