Literature DB >> 18518914

Next generation of elevated [CO2] experiments with crops: a critical investment for feeding the future world.

Elizabeth A Ainsworth1, Claus Beier, Carlo Calfapietra, Reinhart Ceulemans, Mylene Durand-Tardif, Graham D Farquhar, Douglas L Godbold, George R Hendrey, Thomas Hickler, Jörg Kaduk, David F Karnosky, Bruce A Kimball, Christian Körner, Maarten Koornneef, Tanguy Lafarge, Andrew D B Leakey, Keith F Lewin, Stephen P Long, Remy Manderscheid, David L McNeil, Timothy A Mies, Franco Miglietta, Jack A Morgan, John Nagy, Richard J Norby, Robert M Norton, Kevin E Percy, Alistair Rogers, Jean-Francois Soussana, Mark Stitt, Hans-Joachim Weigel, Jeffrey W White.   

Abstract

A rising global population and demand for protein-rich diets are increasing pressure to maximize agricultural productivity. Rising atmospheric [CO(2)] is altering global temperature and precipitation patterns, which challenges agricultural productivity. While rising [CO(2)] provides a unique opportunity to increase the productivity of C(3) crops, average yield stimulation observed to date is well below potential gains. Thus, there is room for improving productivity. However, only a fraction of available germplasm of crops has been tested for CO(2) responsiveness. Yield is a complex phenotypic trait determined by the interactions of a genotype with the environment. Selection of promising genotypes and characterization of response mechanisms will only be effective if crop improvement and systems biology approaches are closely linked to production environments, that is, on the farm within major growing regions. Free air CO(2) enrichment (FACE) experiments can provide the platform upon which to conduct genetic screening and elucidate the inheritance and mechanisms that underlie genotypic differences in productivity under elevated [CO(2)]. We propose a new generation of large-scale, low-cost per unit area FACE experiments to identify the most CO(2)-responsive genotypes and provide starting lines for future breeding programmes. This is necessary if we are to realize the potential for yield gains in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18518914     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01841.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  23 in total

Review 1.  Food security and climate change: on the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Lewis H Ziska; James A Bunce; Hiroyuki Shimono; David R Gealy; Jeffrey T Baker; Paul C D Newton; Matthew P Reynolds; Krishna S V Jagadish; Chunwu Zhu; Mark Howden; Lloyd T Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Systems Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis, Metabolism, and Growth to an Increase in Irradiance in the Photosynthetic Model Organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Tabea Mettler; Timo Mühlhaus; Dorothea Hemme; Mark-Aurel Schöttler; Jens Rupprecht; Adam Idoine; Daniel Veyel; Sunil Kumar Pal; Liliya Yaneva-Roder; Flavia Vischi Winck; Frederik Sommer; Daniel Vosloh; Bettina Seiwert; Alexander Erban; Asdrubal Burgos; Samuel Arvidsson; Stephanie Schönfelder; Anne Arnold; Manuela Günther; Ursula Krause; Marc Lohse; Joachim Kopka; Zoran Nikoloski; Bernd Mueller-Roeber; Lothar Willmitzer; Ralph Bock; Michael Schroda; Mark Stitt
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Phenotypic Plasticity Conditions the Response of Soybean Seed Yield to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration.

Authors:  Etsushi Kumagai; Naohiro Aoki; Yusuke Masuya; Hiroyuki Shimono
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Evolutionary context for understanding and manipulating plant responses to past, present and future atmospheric [CO2].

Authors:  Andrew D B Leakey; Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Improving ecophysiological simulation models to predict the impact of elevated atmospheric CO(2) concentration on crop productivity.

Authors:  Xinyou Yin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Which plant trait explains the variations in relative growth rate and its response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration among Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes derived from a variety of habitats?

Authors:  Riichi Oguchi; Hiroshi Ozaki; Kousuke Hanada; Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Comment on 'improving ecophysiological simulation models to predict the impact of elevated CO(2) concentration on crop productivity' by X. Yin.

Authors:  B A Kimball
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Amelioration of plant responses to drought under elevated CO2 by rejuvenating photosynthesis and nitrogen use efficiency: implications for future climate-resilient crops.

Authors:  Kalva Madhana Sekhar; Vamsee Raja Kota; T Papi Reddy; K V Rao; Attipalli Ramachandra Reddy
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on seed quality.

Authors:  J G Hampton; B Boelt; M P Rolston; T G Chastain
Journal:  J Agric Sci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.476

10.  Modification of photosynthesis and growth responses to elevated CO₂ by ozone in two cultivars of winter wheat with different years of release.

Authors:  D K Biswas; H Xu; Y G Li; B L Ma; G M Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.